Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22023564›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2011

Neuromodulation of reward-based learning and decision making in human aging.

Ben Eppinger, Dorothea Hämmerer, Shu-Chen Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03512171 (Dopaminergic Neuromodulation of Decision Making in Young and Middle-Aged Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 103 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03512171 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Dopaminergic Neuromodulation of Decision Making in Young and Middle-Aged Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled65ConditionsHealthy AdultsArmsDextroamphetamine, Placebo, [18F]Fallypride, [18F]-FE-PE2I
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Comparing engage with PST in late-life major depression: a preliminary report.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2015
    Trial
  5. Dopamine modulates the neural representation of subjective value of food in hungry subjects.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Dopamine modulates episodic memory persistence in old age.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Diminished State Space Theory of Human Aging.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ben EppingerCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. eppinger@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
Dorothea Hämmerer
Shu-Chen Li

Funding

Research Network on Decision Neuroscience and AgingR24AG039350 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CARSTENSEN, LAURA L · 2010 to 2014
$896k
NIA NIH HHS R24 AG039350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we review the current literature to highlight relations between age-associated declines in dopaminergic and serotonergic neuromodulation and adult age differences in adaptive goal-directed behavior. Specifically, we focus on evidence suggesting that deficits in neuromodulation contribute to older adults' behavioral disadvantages in learning and decision making. These deficits are particularly pronounced when reward information is uncertain or the task context requires flexible adaptations to changing stimulus-reward contingencies. Moreover, emerging evidence points to age-related differences in the sensitivity to rewarding and aversive outcomes during learning and decision making if the acquisition of behavior critically depends on outcome processing. These age-related asymmetries in outcome valuation may be explained by age differences in the interplay of dopaminergic and serotonergic neuromodulation. This hypothesis is based on recent neurocomputational and psychopharmacological approaches, which suggest that dopamine and serotonin serve opponent roles in regulating the balance between approach behavior and inhibitory control. Studying adaptive regulation of behavior across the adult life span may shed new light on how the aging brain changes functionally in response to its diminishing resources.

Indexed as

RewardAdaptation, PhysiologicalAgingBrainComputer SimulationDecision MakingDopamineHumansLearningModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeurotransmitter AgentsSerotoninDopamineNeurotransmitter AgentsSerotonin

Identifiers

PMID22023564
PMCPMC3779838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.