ArticlePLoS genetics2011
Natural selection affects multiple aspects of genetic variation at putatively neutral sites across the human genome.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
95 citing papers in PubMed, 179 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allelic gene conversion softens selective sweeps.Genetics · 2026Article
- Causal inference clarifies the roles of background selection and mutation rate variation in shaping human genetic diversity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Insights into human adaptation from ancient DNA.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Identifying Adaptive Footprints in the Presence of Demographic Uncertainty.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- The impact of non-neutral synonymous mutations when inferring selection on nonsynonymous mutations.Genetics · 2025Article
- A model for background selection in non-equilibrium populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The evolutionary dynamics of local adaptations under genetic rescue is determined by mutational load and polygenicity.The Journal of heredity · 2024Article
- Phylogenomic analysis and dynamic evolution of chloroplast genomes of Clematis nannophylla.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Shared evolutionary processes shape landscapes of genomic variation in the great apes.Genetics · 2024Article
- Background Selection From Unlinked Sites Causes Nonindependent Evolution of Deleterious Mutations.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Shared evolutionary processes shape landscapes of genomic variation in the great apes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Assessing the Presence of Recent Adaptation in the Human Genome With Mixture Density Regression.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequences of the medicinal plant Aconitum transsectum (Ranunculaceae): comparative analysis and phylogenetic relationships.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Molecular Evolutionary Rate Predicts Intraspecific Genetic Polymorphism and Species-Specific Selection.Genes · 2022Article
- The genomic signatures of natural selection in admixed human populations.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- A spatially aware likelihood test to detect sweeps from haplotype distributions.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- The estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium are virtually unaffected by natural selection.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Further host-genomic characterization of total antibody response to PRRSV vaccination and its relationship with reproductive performance in commercial sows: genome-wide haplotype and zygosity analyses.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A major question in evolutionary biology is how natural selection has shaped patterns of genetic variation across the human genome. Previous work has documented a reduction in genetic diversity in regions of the genome with low recombination rates. However, it is unclear whether other summaries of genetic variation, like allele frequencies, are also correlated with recombination rate and whether these correlations can be explained solely by negative selection against deleterious mutations or whether positive selection acting on favorable alleles is also required. Here we attempt to address these questions by analyzing three different genome-wide resequencing datasets from European individuals. We document several significant correlations between different genomic features. In particular, we find that average minor allele frequency and diversity are reduced in regions of low recombination and that human diversity, human-chimp divergence, and average minor allele frequency are reduced near genes. Population genetic simulations show that either positive natural selection acting on favorable mutations or negative natural selection acting against deleterious mutations can explain these correlations. However, models with strong positive selection on nonsynonymous mutations and little negative selection predict a stronger negative correlation between neutral diversity and nonsynonymous divergence than observed in the actual data, supporting the importance of negative, rather than positive, selection throughout the genome. Further, we show that the widespread presence of weakly deleterious alleles, rather than a small number of strongly positively selected mutations, is responsible for the correlation between neutral genetic diversity and recombination rate. This work suggests that natural selection has affected multiple aspects of linked neutral variation throughout the human genome and that positive selection is not required to explain these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.