ArticleBMJ open2011
The quality of websites addressing fibromyalgia: an assessment of quality and readability using standardised tools.
Article in BMJ open, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Can Patients Trust Online Health Information? A Meta-narrative Systematic Review Addressing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Developing an Instrument to Evaluate the Quality of Dementia Websites.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Article
- Information needs of people seeking fertility services in Canada: a mixed methods analysis.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Impingement on the internet: evaluating the quality and readability of online subacromial impingement information.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2021Article
- The Quality, Readability, Completeness, and Accuracy of PTSD Websites for Firefighters.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Pelvic vein embolization: an assessment of the readability and quality of online information for patients.CVIR endovascular · 2020Article
- How good is online information on fibromyalgia? An analysis of quality and readability of websites on fibromyalgia in Spanish.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.Clinical rheumatology · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the scope, quality, and health literacy demand of Internet-based anal cancer information.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019Article
- Accuracy, completeness and accessibility of online information on fibromyalgia.Rheumatology international · 2019Article
- Internet Health Behaviors of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Assessment of Two Disease Websites.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2018Article
- Eliciting stock market expectations: The effects of question wording on survey experience and response validity.The journal of behavioral finance · 2018Article
- A longitudinal inquiry into directionality of effects between coping and information needs in hypertensive patients.Psychology research and behavior management · 2018Article
- Informing Public Perceptions About Climate Change: A 'Mental Models' Approach.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- Quality and readability of online information resources on insomnia.Frontiers of medicine · 2017Article
- What do people search online concerning the "elusive" fibromyalgia? Insights from a qualitative and quantitative analysis of Google Trends.Clinical rheumatology · 2017Article
- Investigating Subjective Experience and the Influence of Weather Among Individuals With Fibromyalgia: A Content Analysis of Twitter.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2017Article
- Current Status of Atopic Dermatitis-Related Information Available on the Internet in South Korea.Annals of dermatology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Patients living with fibromyalgia strongly prefer to access health information on the web. However, the majority of subjects in previous studies strongly expressed their concerns about the quality of online information resources. Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate existing online fibromyalgia information resources for content, quality and readability by using standardised quality and readability tools. Methods The first 25 websites were identified using Google and the search keyword 'fibromyalgia'. Pairs of raters independently evaluated website quality using two structured tools (DISCERN and a quality checklist). Readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease score maps. Results Ranking of the websites' quality varied by the tool used, although there was general agreement about the top three websites (Fibromyalgia Information, Fibromyalgia Information Foundation and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases). Content analysis indicated that 72% of websites provided information on treatment options, 68% on symptoms, 60% on diagnosis and 40% on coping and resources. DISCERN ratings classified 32% websites as 'very good', 32% as 'good and 36% as 'marginal'. The mean overall DISCERN score was 36.88 (good). Only 16% of websites met the recommended literacy level grade of 6-8 (range 7-15). Conclusion Higher quality websites tended to be less readable. Online fibromyalgia information resources do not provide comprehensive information about fibromyalgia, and have low quality and poor readability. While information is very important for those living with fibromyalgia, current resources are unlikely to provide necessary or accurate information, and may not be usable for most people.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.