Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22021667›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2011

Bisphosphonate use after estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and risk of contralateral breast cancer.

Genevieve M Monsees, Kathleen E Malone, Mei-Tzu C Tang, Polly A Newcomb, Christopher I Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Bisphosphonate Use and Risk of Recurrence, Second Primary Breast Cancer, and Breast Cancer Mortality in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Article
  7. Oral bisphosphonate use and risk of postmenopausal endometrial cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A prospective study of bisphosphonate use and risk of colorectal cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Genevieve M MonseesSD, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA. gmonsees@fhcrc.org
Kathleen E Malone
Mei-Tzu C Tang
Polly A Newcomb
Christopher I Li
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Developing Data-Driven Cancer ResearchersT32CA009168 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHEN M SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL Chiao-An WU · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
Tamoxifen &Second Breast Cancer: Epidemiology/PathologyR01CA097271 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LI, CHRISTOPHER I · 2003 to 2014
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01-CA097271NCI NIH HHS T32-CA09168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of evidence suggests that nitrogenous bisphosphonates may reduce the risk of developing a first breast cancer and may prevent metastases among breast cancer survivors. However, their impact on risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer is uncertain.

methodsWithin a nested case-control study among women diagnosed with a first primary estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancer at ages 40-79 years, we assessed the association between post-diagnostic bisphosphonate use and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer. We used multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing 351 contralateral breast cancer case subjects with 662 control subjects (ie, breast cancer patients not diagnosed with contralateral breast cancer) who were incidence density-matched on county; race/ethnicity; and age at, year of, and stage at first breast cancer diagnosis. We performed sensitivity analyses with respect to bisphosphonate type and confounding by indication. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsCurrent use of any nitrogenous bisphosphonate and use specifically of alendronate were both associated with reduced risks of contralateral breast cancer compared with never use (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.84 and OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.88, respectively). The risk of contralateral breast cancer further declined with longer durations of bisphosphonate use among current users (P(trend) = .03). Results were similar in analyses restricted to patients with a history of osteoporosis or osteopenia.

conclusionsBisphosphonate use was associated with a substantial reduction in risk of contralateral breast cancer. If this finding is confirmed in additional studies, nitrogenous bisphosphonate therapy may be a feasible approach for contralateral breast cancer risk reduction.

Indexed as

Secondary PreventionAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBone Density Conservation AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesConfidence IntervalsConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDiphosphonatesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesNitrogen CompoundsReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID22021667
PMCPMC3232186
OpenAlexW2159180954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.