ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2011
Bisphosphonate use after estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and risk of contralateral breast cancer.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Use of Bisphosphonates with Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2020Pooled it
- Bisphosphonates in breast cancer radiotherapy: associations with skeletal complications and treatment outcomes - a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Bisphosphonate Use and Breast Cancer Risk among Women with Ductal CarcinomaCancer research · 2021Article
- Preventive drug therapy and contralateral breast cancer: summary of the evidence of clinical trials and observational studies.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2019Review
- Bisphosphonates and primary breast cancer risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis involving 963,995 women.Clinical epidemiology · 2019Article
- Bisphosphonate Use and Risk of Recurrence, Second Primary Breast Cancer, and Breast Cancer Mortality in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018Article
- Oral bisphosphonate use and risk of postmenopausal endometrial cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015Article
- Better contralateral breast cancer risk estimation and alternative options to contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.International journal of women's health · 2015Review
- Beyond aspirin-cancer prevention with statins, metformin and bisphosphonates.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2013Review
- Myeloid-derived suppressor cells function as novel osteoclast progenitors enhancing bone loss in breast cancer.Cancer research · 2013Article
- A prospective study of bisphosphonate use and risk of colorectal cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA growing body of evidence suggests that nitrogenous bisphosphonates may reduce the risk of developing a first breast cancer and may prevent metastases among breast cancer survivors. However, their impact on risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer is uncertain.
methodsWithin a nested case-control study among women diagnosed with a first primary estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancer at ages 40-79 years, we assessed the association between post-diagnostic bisphosphonate use and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer. We used multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing 351 contralateral breast cancer case subjects with 662 control subjects (ie, breast cancer patients not diagnosed with contralateral breast cancer) who were incidence density-matched on county; race/ethnicity; and age at, year of, and stage at first breast cancer diagnosis. We performed sensitivity analyses with respect to bisphosphonate type and confounding by indication. All statistical tests were two-sided.
resultsCurrent use of any nitrogenous bisphosphonate and use specifically of alendronate were both associated with reduced risks of contralateral breast cancer compared with never use (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.84 and OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.88, respectively). The risk of contralateral breast cancer further declined with longer durations of bisphosphonate use among current users (P(trend) = .03). Results were similar in analyses restricted to patients with a history of osteoporosis or osteopenia.
conclusionsBisphosphonate use was associated with a substantial reduction in risk of contralateral breast cancer. If this finding is confirmed in additional studies, nitrogenous bisphosphonate therapy may be a feasible approach for contralateral breast cancer risk reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.