Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22021253›Full record

Trial reportLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2011

Is all motivation good for learning? Dissociable influences of approach and avoidance motivation in declarative memory.

Vishnu P Murty, Kevin S LaBar, Derek A Hamilton, R Alison Adcock

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Goal orientation shifts attentional focus and impairs reward-motivated memory.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Instructed motivational states bias reinforcement learning and memory formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The influence of rewards on incidental memory: more does not mean better.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects ofJournal of medicinal food · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vishnu P MurtyCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Kevin S LaBar
Derek A Hamilton
R Alison Adcock

Funding

Motivated Learning and Memory Neuroimaging Data RepositoryR01DA027802 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LABAR, KEVIN S · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027802NIDA NIH HHS R01DA027802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of approach versus avoidance motivation on declarative learning. Human participants navigated a virtual reality version of the Morris water task, a classic spatial memory paradigm, adapted to permit the experimental manipulation of motivation during learning. During this task, participants were instructed to navigate to correct platforms while avoiding incorrect platforms. To manipulate motivational states participants were either rewarded for navigating to correct locations (approach) or punished for navigating to incorrect platforms (avoidance). Participants' skin conductance levels (SCLs) were recorded during navigation to investigate the role of physiological arousal in motivated learning. Behavioral results revealed that, overall, approach motivation enhanced and avoidance motivation impaired memory performance compared to nonmotivated spatial learning. This advantage was evident across several performance indices, including accuracy, learning rate, path length, and proximity to platform locations during probe trials. SCL analysis revealed three key findings. First, within subjects, arousal interacted with approach motivation, such that high arousal on a given trial was associated with performance deficits. In addition, across subjects, high arousal negated or reversed the benefits of approach motivation. Finally, low-performing, highly aroused participants showed SCL responses similar to those of avoidance-motivation participants, suggesting that for these individuals, opportunities for reward may evoke states of learning similar to those typically evoked by threats of punishment. These results provide a novel characterization of how approach and avoidance motivation influence declarative memory and indicate a critical and selective role for arousal in determining how reinforcement influences goal-oriented learning.

Indexed as

MotivationPunishmentReinforcement, PsychologyRewardSpatial BehaviorAdultArousalAvoidance LearningElectroshockFemaleHumansMaleMaze LearningMemoryUser-Computer InterfaceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22021253
PMCPMC3207256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.