Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22021121›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2013

Effect of socioeconomic status as measured by education level on survival in breast cancer clinical trials.

James E Herndon, Alice B Kornblith, Jimmie C Holland, Electra D Paskett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status: A Pooled Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James E HerndonDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. james.herndon@duke.edu
Alice B Kornblith
Jimmie C Holland
Electra D Paskett

Funding

CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B MINORITY SATELLITE SUPPLEMENU10CA031946 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1985 to 2013
$158.4M
CANCER &LEUKEMIA GROUP B STATISTICAL CENTERU10CA033601 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SARGENT, DANIEL J. · 1985 to 2013
$69.4M
Cancer and Leukemia Group B - The Ohio State UniversityU10CA077658 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLOOMFIELD, CLARA D · 1998 to 2013
$6.0M
CANCER &LEUKEMIA GROUP BU10CA032291 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD J. · 1985 to 2013
$5.8M
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND CANCER AND ACUTE LEUKEMIA GROUP BU10CA077651 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI HUDIS, CLIFFORD A · 1998 to 2013
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA31946NCI NIH HHS CA32291NCI NIH HHS CA33601NCI NIH HHS CA77651NCI NIH HHS CA77658NCI NIH HHS U10 CA031946NCI NIH HHS U10 CA032291NCI NIH HHS U10 CA033601NCI NIH HHS U10 CA077651NCI NIH HHS U10 CA077658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper aims to investigate the effect of socioeconomic status, as measured by education, on the survival of breast cancer patients treated on 10 studies conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

methodsSociodemographic data, including education, were reported by the patient at trial enrollment. Cox proportional hazards model stratified by treatment arm/study was used to examine the effect of education on survival among patients with early stage and metastatic breast cancer, after adjustment for known prognostic factors.

resultsThe patient population included 1020 patients with metastatic disease and 5146 patients with early stage disease. Among metastatic patients, factors associated with poorer survival in the final multivariable model included African American race, never married, negative estrogen receptor status, prior hormonal therapy, visceral involvement, and bone involvement. Among early stage patients, significant factors associated with poorer survival included African American race, separated/widowed, post/perimenopausal, negative/unknown estrogen receptor status, negative progesterone receptor status, >4 positive nodes, tumor diameter >2 cm, and education. Having not completed high school was associated with poorer survival among early stage patients. Among metastatic patients, non-African American women who lacked a high school degree had poorer survival than other non-African American women, and African American women who lacked a high school education had better survival than educated African American women.

conclusionsHaving less than a high school education is a risk factor for death among patients with early stage breast cancer who participated in a clinical trial, with its impact among metastatic patients being less clear. Post-trial survivorship plans need to focus on women with low social status, as measured by education.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicEducational StatusFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSurvival RateUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22021121
PMCPMC3920288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.