Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22020780›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2012

Mass media campaigns and organ donation: managing conflicting messages and interests.

Mohamed Y Rady, Joan L McGregor, Joseph L Verheijde

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Willing to Donate? A Quantitative and Thematic Analysis of Attitudes to Deceased Organ Donation in Different Circumstances.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. First-Person Authorization and Family Objections to Organ Donation.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Campaigning for Organ Donation at Mosques.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Living-Donor Liver Transplantation-The Need for Greater Transparency.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed Y RadyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA. rady.mohamed@mayo.edu
Joan L McGregor
Joseph L Verheijde

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass media campaigns are widely and successfully used to change health decisions and behaviors for better or for worse in society. In the United States, media campaigns have been launched at local offices of the states' department of motor vehicles to promote citizens' willingness to organ donation and donor registration. We analyze interventional studies of multimedia communication campaigns to encourage organ-donor registration at local offices of states' department of motor vehicles. The media campaigns include the use of multifaceted communication tools and provide training to desk clerks in the use of scripted messages for the purpose of optimizing enrollment in organ-donor registries. Scripted messages are communicated to customers through mass audiovisual entertainment media, print materials and interpersonal interaction at the offices of departments of motor vehicles. These campaigns give rise to three serious concerns: (1) bias in communicating information with scripted messages without verification of the scientific accuracy of information, (2) the provision of misinformation to future donors that may result in them suffering unintended consequences from consenting to medical procedures before death (e.g, organ preservation and suitability for transplantation), and (3) the unmanaged conflict of interests for organizations charged with implementing these campaigns, (i.e, dual advocacy for transplant recipients and donors). We conclude the following: (1) media campaigns about healthcare should communicate accurate information to the general public and disclose factual materials with the least amount of bias; (2) conflicting interests in media campaigns should be managed with full public transparency; (3) media campaigns should disclose the practical implications of procurement as well as acknowledge the medical, legal, and religious controversies of determining death in organ donation; (4) organ-donor registration must satisfy the criteria of informed consent; (5) media campaigns should serve as a means of public education about organ donation and should not be a form of propaganda.

Indexed as

Mass MediaCommunicationConflict of InterestDeathDisclosureHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInformed ConsentMarketingTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.