Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22020736›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2012

Association of activated c-Met with NRAS-mutated human melanomas.

Chandrani Chattopadhyay, Julie A Ellerhorst, Suhendan Ekmekcioglu, Victoria R Greene, Michael A Davies, Elizabeth A Grimm

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. SEMAPHORINS and their receptors: focus on the crosstalk between melanoma and hypoxia.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanocytes and Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. MicroRNA-Directed Cancer Therapies: Implications in Melanoma Intervention.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Melanoma management · 2016
    Review
  13. Other targeted drugs in melanoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2015
    Review
  14. Mutational status of naevus-associated melanomas.The British journal of dermatology · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chandrani ChattopadhyayDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Julie A Ellerhorst
Suhendan Ekmekcioglu
Victoria R Greene
Michael A Davies
Elizabeth A Grimm
Melanoma Institute Australia · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USIn-Q-Tel · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kathrin Milbury · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in MelanomaP50CA093459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GRIMM, ELIZABETH A · 2004 to 2014
$23.7M
NCI NIH HHS CCSG CA16672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA093459PHS HHS P50 093459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous melanomas can be divided into three mutually exclusive genetic subsets: tumors with mutated BRAF, tumors with mutated NRAS and tumors wild type at both loci (wt/wt). Targeted therapy for melanoma has been advancing with agents directed to mutated BRAF, accounting for 50% of melanoma patients. The c-Met pathway is known to play a role in melanoma tumorigenesis and preliminary data from our laboratory suggested that this pathway is preferentially activated in NRAS-mutated tumors. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that melanomas carrying the mutated NRAS genotype are uniquely sensitively to c-Met inhibition, thus providing rationale for therapeutic targeting of c-Met in this patient cohort. Using primary human melanomas with known BRAF/NRAS genotypes, we observed greater immunostaining for phosphorylated (activated) c-Met in NRAS-mutated and wt/wt tumors, compared to BRAF-mutated tumors. NRAS-mutated and wt/wt cell lines also demonstrated more robust c-Met activation in response to hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Knock-down of mutated N-Ras, but not wild type N-Ras, by RNA interference resulted in decreased c-Met phosphorylation. Compared to BRAF mutants, NRAS-mutated melanoma cells were more sensitive to pharmacologic c-Met inhibition in terms of c-Met activation, Akt phosphorylation, tumor cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis. This enhanced sensitivity was observed in wt/wt cells as well, but was a less consistent finding. On the basis of these experimental results, we propose that c-Met inhibition may be a useful therapeutic strategy for melanomas with NRAS mutations, as well as some tumors with a wt/wt genotype.

Indexed as

Genes, rasApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationFemaleHepatocyte Growth FactorHumansIndolesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMutationPhosphorylationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt5-((2,6-dichlorobenzyl)sulfonyl)-3-((3,5-dimethyl-4-((2-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)pyrrolidin-1-yl)carbonyl)-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)methylene)-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-oneBRAF protein, humanHepatocyte Growth FactorIndolesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)RNA, Small InterferingSulfones

Identifiers

PMID22020736
PMCPMC3337366
OpenAlexW2033623155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.