Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22020601›Full record

ReviewSpine2011

The role of tissue damage in whiplash-associated disorders: discussion paper 1.

Michele Curatolo, Nikolai Bogduk, Paul C Ivancic, Samuel A McLean, Gunter P Siegmund, Beth A Winkelstein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Spine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03949959 (Effectiveness of Conservative Multimodal Physiotherapy in Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders With Facet-mediated Pain Undergoing Platelet Rich Plasma), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03949959 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Conservative Multimodal Physiotherapy in Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders With Facet-mediated Pain Undergoing Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) Treatment: a Series of Single Case Experimental Designs (SCEDs).

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2019 to 2021Enrolled6ConditionsWhiplash Injuries, Neck Injuries, Platelet Rich PlasmaArmsMultimodal physiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cranio-Mandibular Disorders after Whiplash Injury: A Mono-Institutional Clinical Study on 31 Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michele CuratoloUniversity Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. michele.curatolo@insel.ch
Nikolai Bogduk
Paul C Ivancic
Samuel A McLean
Gunter P Siegmund
Beth A Winkelstein

Funding

Genetic Predictors of Acute and Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain After Minor MVCR01AR056328 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MCLEAN, SAMUEL A. · 2008 to 2011
$2.9M
Nociceptive Mechanisms In Whiplash InjuryR01AR056288 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WINKELSTEIN, BETH A · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Prevention of Neck Injuries in Older Adults During Rear Motor Vehicle CollsionsR01CE001257 · CE · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI IVANCIC, PAUL C. · 2007 to 2009
$860k
NCIPC CDC HHS 5R01CE001257NCIPC CDC HHS R01 CE001257NIAMS NIH HHS AR056288NIAMS NIH HHS AR056328NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056288NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designNonsystematic review of cervical spine lesions in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD).

objectiveTo describe whiplash injury models in terms of basic and clinical science, to summarize what can and cannot be explained by injury models, and to highlight future research areas to better understand the role of tissue damage in WAD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The frequent lack of detectable tissue damage has raised questions about whether tissue damage is necessary for WAD and what role it plays in the clinical context of WAD.

methodsNonsystematic review.

resultsLesions of various tissues have been documented by numerous investigations conducted in animals, cadavers, healthy volunteers, and patients. Most lesions are undetected by imaging techniques. For zygapophysial (facet) joints, lesions have been predicted by bioengineering studies and validated through animal studies; for zygapophysial joint pain, a valid diagnostic test and a proven treatment are available. Lesions of dorsal root ganglia, discs, ligaments, muscles, and vertebral artery have been documented in biomechanical and autopsy studies, but no valid diagnostic test is available to assess their clinical relevance. The proportion of WAD patients in whom a persistent lesion is the major determinant of ongoing symptoms is unknown. Psychosocial factors, stress reactions, and generalized hyperalgesia have also been shown to predict WAD outcomes.

conclusionThere is evidence supporting a lesion-based model in WAD. Lack of macroscopically identifiable tissue damage does not rule out the presence of painful lesions. The best available evidence concerns zygapophysial joint pain. The clinical relevance of other lesions needs to be addressed by future research.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthralgiaBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansNeck PainWhiplash InjuriesWounds and InjuriesZygapophyseal Joint

Identifiers

PMID22020601
PMCPMC3248632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.