Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22020120›Full record

ReviewNature nanotechnology2011

Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid.

Niels de Jonge, Frances M Ross

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature nanotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Liquid Phase TEM of Diffusing Emulsion Droplets.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. [Formation mechanisms, construction, and performance evaluation of self-assembled nanoparticles derived from natural products].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niels de JongeDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2215 Garland Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Frances M Ross

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging samples in liquids with electron microscopy can provide unique insights into biological systems, such as cells containing labelled proteins, and into processes of importance in materials science, such as nanoparticle synthesis and electrochemical deposition. Here we review recent progress in the use of electron microscopy in liquids and its applications. We examine the experimental challenges involved and the resolution that can be achieved with different forms of the technique. We conclude by assessing the potential role that electron microscopy of liquid samples can play in areas such as energy storage and bioimaging.

Indexed as

BiologyEquipment DesignManufactured MaterialsMicrofluidicsMicroscopy, ElectronNanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID22020120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.