Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22020089›Full record

ArticleExperimental cell research2012

Interstitial fluid flow and cyclic strain differentially regulate cardiac fibroblast activation via AT1R and TGF-β1.

P A Galie, M W Russell, M V Westfall, J P Stegemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental cell research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. GPCRs and fibroblast heterogeneity in fibroblast-associated diseases.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Local fluid transfer regulation in heart extracellular matrix.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2016
    Article
  18. Cardiac Fibrosis: The Fibroblast Awakens.Circulation research · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P A GalieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
M W Russell
M V Westfall
J P Stegemann
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Microfluidics in Biomedical Sciences Training ProgramT32EB005582 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FAN, XUDONG · 2005 to 2020
$3.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB005582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac fibroblasts are exposed to both cyclic strain and interstitial fluid flow in the myocardium. The balance of these stimuli is affected by fibrotic scarring, during which the fibroblasts transition to a myofibroblast phenotype. The present study investigates the mechanisms by which cardiac fibroblasts seeded in three-dimensional (3D) collagen gels differentiate between strain and fluid flow. Neonatal cardiac fibroblast-seeded 3D collagen gels were exposed to interstitial flow and/or cyclic strain and message levels of collagens type I and III, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) were assessed. Flow was found to significantly increase and strain to decrease expression of myofibroblast markers. Corresponding immunofluorescence indicated that flow and strain differentially regulated α-SMA protein expression. The effect of flow was inhibited by exposure to losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blocker, and by introduction of shRNA constructs limiting AT1R expression. Blocking of TGF-β also inhibited the myofibroblast transition, suggesting that flow-mediated cell signaling involved both AT1R and TGF-β1. Reduced smad2 phosphorylation in response to cyclic strain suggested that TGF-β is part of the mechanism by which cardiac fibroblasts differentiate between strain-induced and flow-induced mechanical stress. Our experiments show that fluid flow and mechanical deformation have distinct effects on cardiac fibroblast phenotype. Our data suggest a mechanism in which fluid flow directly acts on AT1R and causes increased TGF-β1 expression, whereas cyclic strain reduces activation of smad proteins. These results have relevance to the pathogenesis and treatment of heart failure.

Indexed as

Stress, MechanicalAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAnimalsCells, CulturedExtracellular FluidLosartanMyofibroblastsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1Transforming Growth Factor beta1Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersLosartanReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1Transforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID22020089
PMCPMC3221916
OpenAlexW2048597798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.