Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22018357›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2011

Multi-species bacterial biofilm and intracellular infection in otitis media.

Ruth B Thornton, Paul J Rigby, Selma P Wiertsema, Pierre Filion, Jennifer Langlands, Harvey L Coates, Shyan Vijayasekaran, Anthony D Keil, Peter C Richmond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Modeling airway persistent infection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. In Vivo Optical Characterization of Middle Ear Effusions and Biofilms During Otitis Media.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biofilm aggregates and the host airway-microbial interface.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  18. Differentiation of otitis media-causing bacteria and biofilmsFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Gene Expression Regulation in Airway Pathogens: Importance for Otitis Media.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth B ThorntonSchool of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. rthornton@meddent.uwa.edu.au
Paul J Rigby
Selma P Wiertsema
Pierre Filion
Jennifer Langlands
Harvey L Coates
Shyan Vijayasekaran
Anthony D Keil
Peter C Richmond
The Kids Research Institute Australia · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AUPrincess Margaret Hospital for Children · AUSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacteria which are metabolically active yet unable to be cultured and eradicated by antibiotic treatment are present in the middle ear effusion of children with chronic otitis media with effusion (COME) and recurrent acute otitis media (rAOM). These observations are suggestive of biofilm presence or intracellular sequestration of bacteria and may play a role in OM pathogenesis. The aim of this project is to provide evidence for the presence of otopathogenic bacteria intracellularly or within biofilm in the middle ear mucosa of children with COME or rAOM.

methodsMiddle ear mucosal biopsies from 20 children with COME or rAOM were examined for otopathogenic bacteria (either in biofilm or located intracellularly) using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) or species specific fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). One healthy control biopsy from a child undergoing cochlear implant surgery was also examined.

resultsNo bacteria were observed in the healthy control sample. In 2 of the 3 biopsies imaged using TEM, bacteria were observed in mucus containing vacuoles within epithelial cells. Bacterial species within these could not be identified and biofilm was not observed. Using FISH with CLSM, bacteria were seen in 15 of the 17 otitis media mucosal specimens. In this group, 11 (65%) of the 17 middle ear mucosal biopsies showed evidence of bacterial biofilm and 12 demonstrated intracellular bacteria. 52% of biopsies were positive for both biofilm and intracellular bacteria. At least one otopathogen was identified in 13 of the 15 samples where bacteria were present. No differences were observed between biopsies from children with COME and those with rAOM.

conclusionUsing FISH and CLSM, bacterial biofilm and intracellular infection with known otopathogens are demonstrated on/in the middle ear mucosa of children with COME and/or rAOM. While their role in disease pathogenesis remains to be determined, this previously undescribed infection pattern may help explain the ineffectiveness of current treatment strategies at preventing or resolving COME or rAOM.

Indexed as

BiofilmsBiopsyCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolEar, MiddleFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMucous MembraneOtitis Media

Identifiers

PMID22018357
PMCPMC3224757
OpenAlexW2000568400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.