Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22018278›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2011

Early diagnosis of candidemia in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a prospective comparison of (1→3)-β-D-glucan assay, Candida score, and colonization index.

Brunella Posteraro, Gennaro De Pascale, Mario Tumbarello, Riccardo Torelli, Mariano Alberto Pennisi, Giuseppe Bello, Riccardo Maviglia, Giovanni Fadda, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Massimo Antonelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03674359 (Performance of the Dosage of Plasma 1, 3-β-D-glucan), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03674359 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Performance of the Dosage of Plasma 1, 3-β-D-glucan (BDG) for the Diagnosis of Candidemia in Intensive Care Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2018 to 2022Enrolled2,000ConditionsInfection, FungalArmsBDG analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Diagnostic performance of β-(1→3)-D-glucan, twoJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Neonatal Candida infections in Brazil: study on virulence and antifungal susceptibility with predominance of non-albicans Candida.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Observational
  16. Deep Learning for the Early Diagnosis of Candidemia.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025
    Article
  17. Role of liposomal amphotericin B in intensive care unit: an expert opinion paper.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Review
  18. Invasive Candidiasis in the Intensive Care Unit: Where Are We Now?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. A novel quantitative double antigen sandwich ELISA for detecting total antibodies against Candida albicans enolase 1.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brunella PosteraroInstitute of Microbiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168, Italy.
Gennaro De Pascale
Mario Tumbarello
Riccardo Torelli
Mariano Alberto Pennisi
Giuseppe Bello
Riccardo Maviglia
Giovanni Fadda
Maurizio Sanguinetti
Massimo Antonelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe culture-independent serum (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BG) detection test may allow early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease, but its clinical usefulness needs to be firmly established. A prospective single-center observational study was conducted to compare the diagnostic value of BG assay, Candida score (CS), and colonization index in intensive care unit (ICU) patients at risk for Candida sepsis.

methodsOf 377 patients, consecutively admitted to ICU for sepsis, 95 patients having an ICU stay of more than five days were studied. Blood specimens for fungal culture and BG measurement were obtained at the onset of clinical sepsis. For CS and colonization index calculations, surveillance cultures for Candida growth, and/or clinical data were recorded.

resultsSixteen (16.8%) patients were diagnosed with proven invasive fungal infection, 14 with candidiasis (13 candidemia and 1 mediastinitis) and 2 with pulmonary aspergillosis or fusariosis. Of 14 invasive Candida-infection patients, 13 had a serum sample positive for BG, 10 had a CS value ≥ 3, and 7 a colonization index ≥ 0.5. In the 12 candidemic patients, a positive BG result was obtained 24 to 72 hrs before a culture-documented diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. The positive and negative predictive values for the BG assay were higher than those of CS and colonization index (72.2% versus 57.1% and 27.3%; and 98.7% versus 97.2% and 91.7%, respectively).

conclusionsA single-point BG assay based on a blood sample drawn at the sepsis onset, alone or in combination with CS, may guide the decision to start antifungal therapy early in patients at risk for Candida infection.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overbeta-GlucansCandidaCandidemiaColony Count, MicrobialEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSepsisbeta-Glucans

Identifiers

PMID22018278
PMCPMC3334800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.