Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22017519›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012

Reduction in healthcare and societal resource utilization associated with cladribine tablets in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: analysis of economic data from the CLARITY Study.

Shehzad Ali, Noman Paracha, Stuart Cook, Gavin Giovannoni, Giancarlo Comi, Kottil Rammohan, Peter Rieckmann, Per Soelberg Sørensen, Patrick Vermersch, Steven Greenberg and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00213135 (A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Three-arm, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Cladribine in Subjects With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00213135 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Three-arm, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Cladribine in Subjects With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEMD SeronoRan2005 to 2008Enrolled1,326ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsCladribine 5.25 mg/kg, Cladribine 3.5 mg/kg, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Cladribine to Treat Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shehzad AliOxford Outcomes Ltd., West Way, Botley, Oxford, UK.
Noman Paracha
Stuart Cook
Gavin Giovannoni
Giancarlo Comi
Kottil Rammohan
Peter Rieckmann
Per Soelberg Sørensen
Patrick Vermersch
Steven Greenberg
David A Scott
Alexandre Joyeux
CLARITY (CLAdRIbine Tablets treating multiple sclerosis orallY) Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a common, chronic, neurodegenerative condition associated with substantial healthcare and societal economic burden. Disease-modifying MS treatments have the potential to reduce health resource utilization (HRU), thereby reducing the attendant socioeconomic burden.

objectiveThis study aimed to compare health and societal resource use and productivity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) receiving cladribine tablets versus placebo over 96 weeks in the CLARITY study.

methodsThe CLARITY study was a 96-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with RRMS. HRU data, societal resource use and productivity data were collected at baseline and during scheduled patient visits, at 6-month intervals. The recall period for the HRU questionnaire was 3 months. The study was carried out at 155 sites across 32 countries worldwide. The intent-to-treat population comprised 1326 patients with RRMS randomized to cladribine 3.5 mg/kg (n = 433) or 5.25 mg/kg (n = 456) tablets or placebo (n = 437). Patient subgroups with high baseline disease activity were identified based on criteria of ≥2 relapses in the previous year (n = 392); ≥1 T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesion (n = 413); and ≥2 relapses in the previous year plus ≥1 T1 Gd+ lesion (n = 138). Cladribine tablets were administered in two (3.5 mg/kg group) or four (5.25 mg/kg group) short courses given at 4-week intervals at the start of a 48-week treatment period, followed by another two courses at the start of a subsequent 48-week re-treatment period. Interferon-β rescue therapy was permitted from week 24. Intravenous corticosteroids were available for the treatment of neurological relapses. HRU outcomes included mean number of hospital days and emergency room (ER), clinic and home visits during each study period. Societal resource use and productivity outcomes included mean number of hours and days of paid assistance, mean patient and carer work days missed, and self-reported productivity.

resultsThe mean number of hospital days per patient over 96 weeks was lower in the cladribine tablets groups (3.5 mg/kg group: -3.19 days; 5.25 mg/kg group: -1.54 days [both p < 0.01]) versus placebo. Likewise the mean number of ER visits was lower in both cladribine tablet groups compared with placebo (3.5 mg/kg group: -0.09 visits; 5.25 mg/kg group: -0.11 visits [both p < 0.01]), and the mean number of clinic visits was also lower in both cladribine tablet groups (3.5 mg/kg group: -0.68 visits; 5.25 mg/kg group: -0.66 visits [both p = 0.01]). Furthermore, treatment with cladribine tablets was associated with reduced mean numbers of missed work days for patients (3.5 mg/kg group: -2.42 days [p < 0.01]; 5.25 mg/kg group: -0.60 days [p = 0.50]). Corticosteroid use was lower amongst patients in the cladribine tablet groups than in the placebo group. The reduction in hospital days following treatment with cladribine tablets was also observed in patients with high disease activity at study baseline.

conclusionThis study provides evidence that the efficacy of cladribine tablets observed during the CLARITY study was associated with a reduced consumption of healthcare resources and a decreased need for medical and societal support.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00213135; EudraCT number: 2004-005148-28.

Indexed as

Health Care RationingCladribineDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPlacebosTabletsCladribineImmunosuppressive AgentsPlacebosTablets

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.