ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2012
Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Developing Generalizable Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking: Challenges and Perspectives.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Expanding Predictive Capacities in Toxicology: Insights from Hackathon-Enhanced Data and Model Aggregation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting Protein-Ligand Docking Structure with Graph Neural Network.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022Review
- GPU-Accelerated Flexible Molecular Docking.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021Article
- Computational Prediction of Chemical Tools for Identification and Validation of Synthetic Lethal Interaction Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- MedusaDock 2.0: Efficient and Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking With Constraints.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2019Article
- The discovery of novel HDAC3 inhibitors via virtual screening and in vitro bioassay.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2018Article
- Maximal Unbiased Benchmarking Data Sets for Human Chemokine Receptors and Comparative Analysis.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2018Article
- The Development of Target-Specific Pose Filter Ensembles To Boost Ligand Enrichment for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2017Article
- Considerations of Protein Subpockets in Fragment-Based Drug Design.Chemical biology & drug design · 2016Article
- Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2015Article
- In silico design of anti-atherogenic biomaterials.Biomaterials · 2013Article
- Quantum Mechanics Approaches to Drug Research in the Era of Structural Chemogenomics.International journal of quantum chemistry · 2013Article
- QSAR model based on weighted MCS trees approach for the representation of molecule data sets.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2013Article
- Article
- Compound activity prediction using models of binding pockets or ligand properties in 3D.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poor performance of scoring functions is a well-known bottleneck in structure-based virtual screening (VS), which is most frequently manifested in the scoring functions' inability to discriminate between true ligands vs known nonbinders (therefore designated as binding decoys). This deficiency leads to a large number of false positive hits resulting from VS. We have hypothesized that filtering out or penalizing docking poses recognized as non-native (i.e., pose decoys) should improve the performance of VS in terms of improved identification of true binders. Using several concepts from the field of cheminformatics, we have developed a novel approach to identifying pose decoys from an ensemble of poses generated by computational docking procedures. We demonstrate that the use of target-specific pose (scoring) filter in combination with a physical force field-based scoring function (MedusaScore) leads to significant improvement of hit rates in VS studies for 12 of the 13 benchmark sets from the clustered version of the Database of Useful Decoys (DUD). This new hybrid scoring function outperforms several conventional structure-based scoring functions, including XSCORE::HMSCORE, ChemScore, PLP, and Chemgauss3, in 6 out of 13 data sets at early stage of VS (up 1% decoys of the screening database). We compare our hybrid method with several novel VS methods that were recently reported to have good performances on the same DUD data sets. We find that the retrieved ligands using our method are chemically more diverse in comparison with two ligand-based methods (FieldScreen and FLAP::LBX). We also compare our method with FLAP::RBLB, a high-performance VS method that also utilizes both the receptor and the cognate ligand structures. Interestingly, we find that the top ligands retrieved using our method are highly complementary to those retrieved using FLAP::RBLB, hinting effective directions for best VS applications. We suggest that this integrative VS approach combining cheminformatics and molecular mechanics methodologies may be applied to a broad variety of protein targets to improve the outcome of structure-based drug discovery studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.