ArticleMobile genetic elements2011
Independently derived targeting of 28S rDNA by A- and D-clade R2 retrotransposons: Plasticity of integration mechanism.
Article in Mobile genetic elements, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biology and utilization of R2 retrotransposons.RNA biology · 2025Review
- Structures of vertebrate R2 retrotransposon complexes during target-primed reverse transcription and after second-strand nicking.Science advances · 2025Article
- Harnessing eukaryotic retroelement proteins for transgene insertion into human safe-harbor loci.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Distinct and overlapping RNA determinants for binding and target-primed reverse transcription by Bombyx mori R2 retrotransposon protein.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Conserved and divergent DNA recognition specificities and functions of R2 retrotransposon N-terminal domains.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Integration site selection by retroviruses and transposable elements in eukaryotes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2017Review
- Endonuclease domain of non-LTR retrotransposons: loss-of-function mutants and modeling of the R2Bm endonuclease.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Integration, Regulation, and Long-Term Stability of R2 Retrotransposons.Microbiology spectrum · 2015Review
- Randomly detected genetically modified (GM) maize (Zea mays L.) near a transport route revealed a fragile 45S rDNA phenotype.PloS one · 2013Article
- Non-LTR R2 element evolutionary patterns: phylogenetic incongruences, rapid radiation and the maintenance of multiple lineages.PloS one · 2013Article
- Targeting novel sites: The N-terminal DNA binding domain of non-LTR retrotransposons is an adaptable module that is implicated in changing site specificities.Mobile genetic elements · 2011Article
- The Wide Distribution and Change of Target Specificity of R2 Non-LTR Retrotransposons in Animals.PloS oneArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restriction-like endonuclease (RLE) bearing non-LTR retrotransposons are site-specific elements that integrate into the genome through a target primed reverse transcription mechanism (TPRT). R2 elements have been used as a model system for investigating non-LTR retrotransposon integration. We previously demonstrated that R2 retrotransposons require two subunits of the element-encoded multifunctional protein to integrate-one subunit bound upstream of the insertion site and one bound downstream. R2 elements have been phylogenetically categorized into four clades: R2-A, B, C and D, that diverged from a common ancestor more than 850 million years ago. All R2 elements target the same sequence within 28S rDNA. The amino-terminal domain of R2Bm, an R2-D clade element, contains a single zinc finger and a Myb motif that are responsible for binding R2 protein downstream of the insertion site. Target site recognition is of interest as it is the first step in the integration reaction and may help elucidate evolutionary history and integration mechanism. The amino-terminal domain of R2-A clade members contains three zinc fingers and a Myb motif. We show here that R2Lp, an R2-A clade member, uses its amino-terminal DNA binding motifs to bind upstream of the insertion site. Because the R2-A and R2-D clade elements recognize 28S rDNA differently, we conclude the A- and D-clades represent independent targeting events to the 28S site. Our results also indicate a certain plasticity of insertional mechanics exists between the two clades.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.