Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22016838›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2011

Mechanisms of aneuploidy induction by RAS and RAF oncogenes.

Tamihiro Kamata, Catrin Pritchard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hyper-active RAS/MAPK introduces cancer-specific mitotic vulnerabilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Role of Aneuploidy in Cancer Evolution.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Aneuploidy in health, disease, and aging.The Journal of cell biology · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. K-In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamihiro KamataDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Leicester University Road, Leicester, LEI 7RH, UK.
Catrin Pritchard
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cancers progress with the accumulation of genetic mutations with time and this is frequently associated with the acquisition of genomic instability in the form of whole chromosome changes, chromosomal rearrangements, gene amplifications or smaller changes at the nucleotide level. Whole chromosome instability (W-CIN), characterised by aneuploidy, is a major form of genomic instability observed in human cancers and several lines of evidence now support the argument that W-CIN is a promoter of tumourigenesis rather than being a passenger event. The primary mechanism proposed for evolution of CIN is abnormalities in mitosis/cytokinesis. However, mutations in genes directly involved in controlling mitosis/cytokinesis are rare in human cancers and so the mechanisms underpinning the evolution of CIN in cancers are not currently clear. On the other hand, mutations in RAS or BRAF are frequently found in human cancers, many of which demonstrate CIN, suggesting a possible link between deregulated signaling through the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and CIN. In this review, we focus on a potential relationship between deregulated RAS/RAF signaling and CIN, and discuss possible mechanisms connecting the two.

Indexed as

aneuploidyBRAFcancerCRAFERKgenome instabilitymouse modelsoncogenesRAS

Identifiers

PMID22016838
PMCPMC3196290
OpenAlexW1597530217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.