Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22016537›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

An olfactory circuit increases the fidelity of visual behavior.

Dawnis M Chow, Jamie C Theobald, Mark A Frye

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Wind history shapes olfactory search response in free flyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nonsynaptic Transmission Mediates Light Context-Dependent Odor Responses inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neuromodulation of insect motion vision.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multisensory integration of colors and scents: insights from bees and flowers.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Responses of protocerebral neurons in Manduca sexta to sex-pheromone mixtures.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Parallel pathways for cross-modal memory retrieval in Drosophila.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dawnis M ChowMolecular, Cellular and Integrative Physiology Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Jamie C Theobald
Mark A Frye
Florida International University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal integration allows neural circuits to be activated in a behaviorally context-specific manner. In the case of odor plume tracking by Drosophila, an attractive odorant increases the influence of yaw-optic flow on steering behavior in flight, which enhances visual stability reflexes, resulting in straighter flight trajectories within an odor plume. However, it is not well understood whether context-specific changes in optomotor behavior are the result of an increased sensitivity to motion inputs (e.g., through increased visual attention) or direct scaling of motor outputs (i.e., increased steering gain). We address this question by examining the optomotor behavior of Drosophila melanogaster in a tethered flight assay and demonstrate that whereas olfactory cues decrease the gain of the optomotor response to sideslip optic flow, they concomitantly increase the gain of the yaw optomotor response by enhancing the animal's ability to follow transient visual perturbations. Furthermore, ablating the mushroom bodies (MBs) of the fly brain via larval hydroxyurea (HU) treatment results in a loss of olfaction-dependent increase in yaw optomotor fidelity. By expressing either tetanus toxin light chain or diphtheria toxin in gal4-defined neural circuits, we were able to replicate the loss of function observed in the HU treatment within the lines expressing broadly in the mushroom bodies, but not within specific mushroom body lobes. Finally, we were able to genetically separate the yaw responses and sideslip responses in our behavioral assay. Together, our results implicate the MBs in a fast-acting, memory-independent olfactory modification of a visual reflex that is critical for flight control.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBehavior, AnimalCuesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleFlight, AnimalHydroxyureaLarvaMotionMushroom BodiesOlfactory PathwaysPhotic StimulationDrosophila ProteinsEnzyme InhibitorsGAL4 protein, DrosophilaHydroxyureaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22016537
PMCPMC3749065
OpenAlexW2158980310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.