Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22016106›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2012

Thrombolytic effects of a combined therapy with targeted microbubbles and ultrasound in a 6 h cerebral thrombosis rabbit model.

Shu-Ting Ren, Li-Hui Long, Mei Wang, Yi-Ping Li, Hao Qin, Hui Zhang, Bo-Bin Jing, Ying-Xue Li, Wei-Jin Zang, Bing Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Pathways Involved in Oxygen Glucose Deprivation Damage of Astrocytes.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shu-Ting RenDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.
Li-Hui Long
Mei Wang
Yi-Ping Li
Hao Qin
Hui Zhang
Bo-Bin Jing
Ying-Xue Li
Wei-Jin Zang
Bing Wang
Xin-Liang Shen
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNChina National Biotechnology (China) · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXi'an Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous study has shown that P1 polypeptide-loaded microbubbles (clot-targeted microbubbles, TMB) are effective for thrombolysis and recanalization in a 0.5 h cerebral thrombosis rabbit model when combined with low-frequency ultrasound (LFUS, 0.8 MHz). However, the thrombolytic effects of TMB combined with LFUS are still unclear in a 6 h cerebral thrombosis rabbit model, which closely resembles human embolic stroke. Aiming to extend the 3 h therapeutic window limitation of thrombolytic drugs, a 6 h cerebral thrombosis model of common carotid artery (CCA) occlusion was induced in rabbits, and thrombolysis using TMB by intra-arterial (IA) and intravenous (IV) application combined with LFUS was then compared to untargeted microbubbles (UTMB) and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). The patency score and thrombolysis in brain ischemia (TIBI) in IA TMB combined with LFUS (IA TMB/LFUS) were significantly higher compared to the IA normal saline control with LFUS (IA SC/LFUS) (both P < 0.05) and IA UTMB plus LFUS (IA UTMB/LFUS) (both P < 0.05), respectively. The recanalization rate in the IA TMB/LFUS group (66.67%) was significantly higher compared to the IA SC/LFUS group (12.50%, P < 0.05). The patency score, TIBI and recanalization rate of IA TMB/LFUS were higher than in the IV TMB/LFUS group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups, which was similar to the infarction ratio. TMB/LFUS is an effective and safe therapy for thrombolysis in a 6 h cerebral thrombosis rabbit model, and the IA TMB/LFUS group was slightly better than the IV TMB/LFUS group.

Indexed as

AnimalsCombined Modality TherapyDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsIntracranial ThrombosisMaleMicrobubblesRabbitsRandom AllocationThrombolytic TherapyUltrasonic TherapyUltrasonographyFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22016106
OpenAlexW1995110260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.