Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22015991›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2012

Feasibility study of intra-patient sorafenib dose-escalation or re-escalation in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors.

Thomas J Semrad, Courtney Eddings, Chong-Xian Pan, Derick H Lau, David Gandara, Laurel Beckett, Primo N Lara

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00810394 (Single Agent Sorafenib in Advanced Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00810394 phase2completednot on this map

Single Agent Sorafenib in Advanced Solid Tumors: Phase II Evaluation of Dose Re-Escalation Following a Dose Reduction (IST000375)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2008 to 2012Enrolled50ConditionsUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol SpecificArmsSorafenib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J SemradDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. thomas.semrad@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Courtney Eddings
Chong-Xian Pan
Derick H Lau
David Gandara
Laurel Beckett
Primo N Lara
University of California, Davis · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USVA Northern California Health Care System · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000002 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2012 to 2015
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000002NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS P30CA093373-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if intra-patient dose escalation of the multi-targeted kinase inhibitor sorafenib is feasible in patients with advanced pretreated solid malignancies.

methodsAn intra-patient dose escalation scheme starting at 400 mg BID was employed in this prospective trial. Doses were escalated to 600 mg BID for the second cycle and to 800 mg BID for the third cycle in the absence of grade 3+ adverse events. In the event of grade 3+ adverse events during cycle 1, doses were reduced to 400 mg daily through cycle 2. Dose re-escalation for cycle 3 was allowed in the absence of grade 3+ adverse events during cycle 2. Further dose escalation was prohibited. The primary endpoint was the overall percentage of patients tolerating dose escalation to 600 mg BID through cycle 2 or tolerating re-escalation to 400 mg BID through cycle 3.

resultsFifty eligible patients with various solid tumors and a median of 3 prior therapies were enrolled. Eleven patients (22%) tolerated primary dose escalation or re-escalation. Only 14 patients (28%) completed cycle 1 without dose modification or discontinuing treatment. Seven of 13 patients tolerated primary dose escalation through cycle 2. Four of 5 patients tolerated dose re-escalation through cycle 3. Reasons for escalation failure included tumor progression (42%) and adverse events (26%). Common grade 3+ adverse events included hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, and hypophosphatemia.

conclusionsIntra-patient dose escalation and/or re-escalation of sorafenib were not feasible in pretreated solid tumor patients. Sorafenib dose escalation remains an investigational approach.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug ToleranceFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProspective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID22015991
PMCPMC4131984
OpenAlexW2087225514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.