Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22015849›Full record

ArticleDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2011

[Rosacea. Systemic therapy with retinoids].

A Thielitz, H Gollnick

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sudden Appearance of Indurated Erythematous Plaques on a Man's Face.Case reports in dermatological medicine · 2016
    Article
  2. [Lupoid rosacea as a special form of rosacea: review of pathogenesis and therapeutic options].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2013
    Review
  3. [Successful treatment of granulomatous rosacea with dapsone].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A ThielitzUniversitätsklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie , Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg. anja.thielitz@med.ovgu.de
H Gollnick
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic isotretinoin has been known for decades as an effective and safe therapeutic option in the treatment of severe and refractory forms of rosacea. It can also be used in special treatment-resistant forms of rosacea, e.g. granulomatous rosacea, as efficacious second-line therapy. Previously, the effect of isotretinoin in rosacea has been mainly studied in small cohorts or anecdotal reports. Recently, a big randomized double-blind dose-response and comparative study revealed that an optimized dosage of 0,3 mg/kg was superior to other dosages and non-inferior to doxycycline as gold standard of systemic rosacea treatment and proved effective and safe in papulopustular and phymatous subtypes. However, the substance is still not licensed for this indication The efficacy of isotretinoin in rosacea is probably mainly related to anti-inflammatory mechanisms as well as anti-oxidative, anti-angiogenic and antifibrotic properties. The classical antiseborrheic effect of isotretinoin might play a role in special subtypes like the phymatous type or rosacea fulminans.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDermatologic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEvidence-Based MedicineHumansIsotretinoinRosaceaSkinTreatment OutcomeDermatologic AgentsIsotretinoin

Identifiers

PMID22015849
OpenAlexW2264344125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.