Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22015542›Full record

Trial reportPrimary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group2012

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy in primary care asthma management: effects on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma control.

Roland A Riemersma, Dirkje Postma, Thys van der Molen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting βAdvances in therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Single inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) in general practice asthma management: where are we?Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roland A RiemersmaDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. ra.riemersma@home.nl
Dirkje Postma
Thys van der Molen
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of asthma has changed since the introduction of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort®) as both maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART). SMART and its effects on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) have not been studied in primary care.

aimsTo compare the effects of SMART and guideline-driven usual care (UC) on BHR and clinical asthma severity in primary care practice.

methodsPatients with mild-to-moderate stable asthma were randomised to receive SMART treatment (n=54) (budesonide/formoterol 80/4.5 μg Turbuhaler®, two puffs once daily and extra inhalations as needed) or UC treatment (n=48) for 12 months. Diary data, Asthma Control Questionnaire scores, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements were collected during run-in and after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment. BHR, measured as the dose of histamine provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% (PD20-histamine), was determined at randomisation and after 12 months.

resultsOne hundred and two patients with asthma participated in the study. The change in PD20-histamine during the study was not significantly different between the SMART and UC groups (p=0.26). The mean inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose was 326 μg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) equivalents/day (95% CI 254 to 399) with SMART, which was significantly lower (p<0.0001) than the mean ICS dose with UC treatment (798 μg BDP equivalents/day (95% CI 721 to 875). Morning and evening PEF values increased significantly with SMART treatment compared with UC; FEV1, symptoms and asthma control did not differ.

conclusionsDespite a 59% lower dose of ICS, BHR and other clinical outcomes remained stable during SMART treatment while PEF values improved.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBudesonideBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHistamineHistamine AgonistsHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBudesonideBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesHistamineHistamine Agonists

Identifiers

PMID22015542
PMCPMC6548307
OpenAlexW2053173651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.