Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22015249›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2011

Water proton spin saturation affects measured protein backbone 15N spin relaxation rates.

Kang Chen, Nico Tjandra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pitfalls in measurements of RJournal of biomolecular NMR · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. NMR studies of dynamic biomolecular conformational ensembles.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · 2015
    Review
  11. Long-chain flavodoxin FldB from Escherichia coli.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kang ChenLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
Nico Tjandra

Funding

Regulation of mitochondria morphologyZIAHL006064 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI TJANDRA, NICO · 2010 to 2025
$20.9M
Nmr Studies Of The Regulation Of Cell SignalingZIAHL001048 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI TJANDRA, NICO · 2009 to 2025
$20.1M
NMR STUDIES OF THE REGULATION OF CELL SIGNALINGZ01HL001048 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI TJANDRA, NICO · 1998 to 2008
$3.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HL001048Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HL001048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein backbone 15N NMR spin relaxation rates are useful in characterizing the protein dynamics and structures. To observe the protein nuclear-spin resonances a pulse sequence has to include a water suppression scheme. There are two commonly employed methods, saturating or dephasing the water spins with pulse field gradients and keeping them unperturbed with flip-back pulses. Here different water suppression methods were incorporated into pulse sequences to measure 15N longitudinal T1 and transversal rotating-frame T1ρ spin relaxation. Unexpectedly the 15N T1 relaxation time constants varied significantly with the choice of water suppression method. For a 25-kDa Escherichiacoli. glutamine binding protein (GlnBP) the T1 values acquired with the pulse sequence containing a water dephasing gradient are on average 20% longer than the ones obtained using a pulse sequence containing the water flip-back pulse. In contrast the two T1ρ data sets are correlated without an apparent offset. The average T1 difference was reduced to 12% when the experimental recycle delay was doubled, while the average T1 values from the flip-back measurements were nearly unchanged. Analysis of spectral signal to noise ratios (s/n) showed the apparent slower 15N relaxation obtained with the water dephasing experiment originated from the differences in 1HN recovery for each relaxation time point. This in turn offset signal reduction from 15N relaxation decay. The artifact becomes noticeable when the measured 15N relaxation time constant is comparable to recycle delay, e.g., the 15N T1 of medium to large proteins. The 15N relaxation rates measured with either water suppression schemes yield reasonable fits to the structure. However, data from the saturated scheme results in significantly lower Model-Free order parameters (<S2>=0.81) than the non-saturated ones (<S2>=0.88), indicating such order parameters may be previously underestimated.

Indexed as

ProtonsAlgorithmsAmino Acid Transport Systems, NeutralAnisotropyArtifactsDiffusion Tensor ImagingDNA, ComplementaryEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsIsotope LabelingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNitrogenNitrogen IsotopesSignal-To-Noise RatioWaterAmino Acid Transport Systems, NeutralDNA, ComplementaryEscherichia coli ProteinsglnH protein, E coliNitrogenNitrogen IsotopesProtonsWater

Identifiers

PMID22015249
PMCPMC3339441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.