ArticleDisability and health journal2011
Issues using the life history calendar in disability research.
Article in Disability and health journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Life-Course Perspectives of Mexican American Men With Mobility Limitation.Qualitative health research · 2023Article
- Tracking Needs-Based Community and Specialized Services of Young Adults and Their Parents Before and During a First Episode of Psychosis (FEP): Highlighting Intervention Trajectories in FEP.Health services insights · 2023Article
- A qualitative analysis of life course adjustment to multiple morbidity and disability.Research in gerontological nursing · 2013Article
- The pain and suffering of a Mexican American woman with mobility impairment.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOverall, there is a dearth of research reporting mixed-method data collection procedures using the life history calendar (LHC) within disability research.
objectiveThis report provides practical knowledge on use of the LHC from the perspective of a mixed-method life history study of mobility impairment situated within a qualitative paradigm.
methodsThe authors reviewed the method-related literature referring to the LHC along with its epistemologic underpinnings. Further, the uses of the LHC in disability research were illustrated using preliminary data from reports of disablement in Mexican American and non-Hispanic white women with permanent mobility impairment.
resultsFrom our perspective, the LHC was most useful as approached from an interpretive paradigm when gathering data from women of varied ethnic and socioeconomic strata. While we found the LHC the most useful tool currently available for studying disablement over the life course, there were challenges associated with its use. The LHC required extensive interviewer training. In addition, large segments of time were needed for completion depending on the type of participant responses.
conclusionsResearchers planning to conduct a disability study may find our experience using the LHC valuable for anticipating issues that may arise when the LHC is used in mixed-method research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.