Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22014650›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2011

A new chapter in the transcription SAGA.

Nadine L Samara, Cynthia Wolberger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nuclear mRNA Export and Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Molecular Mechanisms of DUBs Regulation in Signaling and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structural basis for activation of SAGA histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 by partner subunit Ada2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadine L SamaraDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 725 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Cynthia Wolberger
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Structure and Function of the SAGA Deubiquitinating ModuleR01GM095822 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WOLBERGER, CYNTHIA · 2011 to 2018
$2.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic transcriptional coactivators are multi-subunit complexes that both modify chromatin and recognize histone modifications. Until recently, structural information on these large complexes has been limited to isolated enzymatic domains or chromatin-binding motifs. This review summarizes recent structural studies of the SAGA coactivator complex that have greatly advanced our understanding of the interplay between its different subunits. The structure of the four-protein SAGA deubiquitinating module has provided a first glimpse of the larger organization of a coactivator complex, and illustrates how interdependent subunits interact with each other to form an active and functional enzyme complex. In addition, structures of the histone binding domains of ATXN7 and Sgf29 shed light on the interactions with chromatin that help recruit the SAGA complex.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAnimalsBinding SitesChromatinHumansProtein SubunitsStructure-Activity RelationshipTrans-ActivatorsChromatinProtein SubunitsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID22014650
PMCPMC3232345
OpenAlexW1987354945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.