Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22014319›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2011

Neonatal white matter abnormality predicts childhood motor impairment in very preterm children.

Alicia J Spittle, Jeanie Cheong, Lex W Doyle, Gehan Roberts, Katherine J Lee, Jeremy Lim, Rod W Hunt, Terrie E Inder, Peter J Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Involvement of the EndothelialThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recovery of the brain after intraventricular hemorrhage.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alicia J SpittleVictorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. aspittle@unimelb.edu.au
Jeanie Cheong
Lex W Doyle
Gehan Roberts
Katherine J Lee
Jeremy Lim
Rod W Hunt
Terrie E Inder
Peter J Anderson

Funding

Neurobehavioral Impairments in Preterm Children - A Longitudinal MR StudyR01HD058056 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI INDER, TERRIE E · 2008 to 2011
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimChildren born very preterm are at risk for impaired motor performance ranging from cerebral palsy (CP) to milder abnormalities, such as developmental coordination disorder. White matter abnormalities (WMA) at term have been associated with CP in very preterm children; however, little is known about the impact of WMA on the range of motor impairments. The aim of this study was to assess whether WMA were predictive of all levels of motor impairments in very preterm children.

methodTwo hundred and twenty-seven very preterm infants (< 30 wks gestational age or birthweight < 1250 g) had brain magnetic resonance imaging at term-equivalent age to assess for WMA, which were categorized as nil, mild, or moderate to severe. At 5 years of age children were classified as having a moderate to severe motor impairment if they were below the 5th centile or mild to severe motor impairment if their score placed them no higher than the 15th centile on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC). WMA (nil vs mild and nil vs moderate-severe) were explored as predictors of motor impairment using logistic regression. Analyses were repeated adjusting for the effects of other perinatal variables and excluding children with CP.

resultsOf the 193 very preterm children (97 males, 96 females) assessed with the MABC, 53 (27%) were classified as having a moderate to severe motor impairment and 96 (50%) a mild to severe motor impairment. WMA were predictive of motor impairment in very preterm children, with mild versus no WMA increasing the odds of moderate to severe motor impairment by over fivefold (odds ratio [OR] 5.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-16.1; p=0.002) and mild to severe impairment by twofold (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.2; p=0.02). Compared with no WMA, moderate to severe WMA increased the odds for moderate to severe impairment 19-fold (OR 19.4; 95% CI 5.6-66.7; p<0.001) and for mild to severe motor impairment ninefold (OR 9.4; 95% CI 3.2-28.1; p<0.001). Results remained similar after controlling for several potential confounders and after excluding 14 children who had CP at age 2 years.

interpretationWMA predict motor impairment at 5 years, with rates of impairment increasing with more severe WMA. Very preterm children with any WMA at term require follow-up throughout childhood.

Indexed as

BrainChild, PreschoolConfidence IntervalsDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMovement DisordersNerve Fibers, MyelinatedOdds RatioPredictive Value of TestsPremature BirthSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID22014319
PMCPMC4040368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.