Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22014273›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2011

Chromothripsis is a common mechanism driving genomic rearrangements in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Wigard P Kloosterman, Marlous Hoogstraat, Oscar Paling, Masoumeh Tavakoli-Yaraki, Ivo Renkens, Joost S Vermaat, Markus J van Roosmalen, Stef van Lieshout, Isaac J Nijman, Wijnand Roessingh and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Micronuclei: origins, assays, mechanisms, diseases and treatments.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Chromothripsis in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Chromothripsis in myeloid malignancies.Annals of hematology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Double-checking chromosome segregation.The Journal of cell biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wigard P KloostermanDepartment of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht, 3584 CG, The Netherlands.
Marlous Hoogstraat
Oscar Paling
Masoumeh Tavakoli-Yaraki
Ivo Renkens
Joost S Vermaat
Markus J van Roosmalen
Stef van Lieshout
Isaac J Nijman
Wijnand Roessingh
Ruben van 't Slot
José van de Belt
Victor Guryev
Marco Koudijs
Emile Voest
Edwin Cuppen
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLHubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructural rearrangements form a major class of somatic variation in cancer genomes. Local chromosome shattering, termed chromothripsis, is a mechanism proposed to be the cause of clustered chromosomal rearrangements and was recently described to occur in a small percentage of tumors. The significance of these clusters for tumor development or metastatic spread is largely unclear.

resultsWe used genome-wide long mate-pair sequencing and SNP array profiling to reveal that chromothripsis is a widespread phenomenon in primary colorectal cancer and metastases. We find large and small chromothripsis events in nearly every colorectal tumor sample and show that several breakpoints of chromothripsis clusters and isolated rearrangements affect cancer genes, including NOTCH2, EXO1 and MLL3. We complemented the structural variation studies by sequencing the coding regions of a cancer exome in all colorectal tumor samples and found somatic mutations in 24 genes, including APC, KRAS, SMAD4 and PIK3CA. A pairwise comparison of somatic variations in primary and metastatic samples indicated that many chromothripsis clusters, isolated rearrangements and point mutations are exclusively present in either the primary tumor or the metastasis and may affect cancer genes in a lesion-specific manner.

conclusionsWe conclude that chromothripsis is a prevalent mechanism driving structural rearrangements in colorectal cancer and show that a complex interplay between point mutations, simple copy number changes and chromothripsis events drive colorectal tumor development and metastasis.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsGene RearrangementCase-Control StudiesChromosomes, HumanColorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, NeoplasmDNA Repair EnzymesExodeoxyribonucleasesFemaleGene DosageGene FrequencyGenes, NeoplasmHumansLiver NeoplasmsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, NeoplasmDNA Repair EnzymesEXO1 protein, humanExodeoxyribonucleasesKMT2C protein, humanNOTCH2 protein, humanReceptor, Notch2

Identifiers

PMID22014273
PMCPMC3333773
OpenAlexW2133744934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.