Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22014145›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2011

Cattle remain immunocompetent during the acute phase of foot-and-mouth disease virus infection.

Miriam A Windsor, B Veronica Carr, Bartomiej Bankowski, Debi Gibson, Elizabeth Reid, Pip Hamblin, Simon Gubbins, Nicholas Juleff, Bryan Charleston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miriam A WindsorPirbright Laboratory, Institute for Animal Health, Ash Road, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK. bryan.charleston@iah.ac.uk.
B Veronica Carr
Bartomiej Bankowski
Debi Gibson
Elizabeth Reid
Pip Hamblin
Simon Gubbins
Nicholas Juleff
Bryan Charleston
The Pirbright Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/B/00549Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00001444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection of cattle with foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) results in the development of long-term protective antibody responses. In contrast, inactivated antigen vaccines fail to induce long-term protective immunity. Differences between susceptible species have also been observed during infection with FMDV, with cattle often developing persistent infections whilst pigs develop more severe symptoms and excrete higher levels of virus. This study examined the early immune response to FMDV in naïve cattle after in-contact challenge. Cattle exposed to FMDV were found to be viraemic and produced neutralising antibody, consistent with previous reports. In contrast to previous studies in pigs these cattle did not develop leucopenia, and the proliferative responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to either mitogen or third party antigen were not suppressed. Low levels of type 1 interferon and IL-10 were detected in the circulation. Taken together, these results suggest that there was no generalised immunosuppression during the acute phase of FMDV infection in cattle.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityImmunity, InnateImmunosuppression TherapyAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCytokinesFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusLeukocyte CountMalePolymerase Chain ReactionTime FactorsCytokines

Identifiers

PMID22014145
PMCPMC3207891
OpenAlexW2119168502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.