ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2011
Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing deep statistical potential for biophysical scoring of protein-peptide interactions.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Identifying potent inhibitors for Mycobacterium tuberculosis MabA (FabG1).Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of the Antiviral Activity of Polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Against Mayaro Virus.Viruses · 2025Article
- Normalized Protein-Ligand Distance Likelihood Score for End-to-End Blind Docking and Virtual Screening.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Detailed Analyses of Molecular Interactions between Favipiravir and RNA Viruses In Silico.Viruses · 2022Article
- Target specificity of selective bioactive compounds in blocking α-dystroglycan receptor to suppress Lassa virus infection: anJournal of biomedical research · 2021Article
- Ligand Strain Energy in Large Library Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021Article
- Extension of an Atom-Atom Dispersion Function to Halogen Bonds and Its Use for Rational Design of Drugs and Biocatalysts.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2021Article
- How Far Are We from the Rapid Prediction of Drug Resistance Arising Due to Kinase Mutations?ACS omega · 2021Article
- Archiving and disseminating integrative structure models.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2019Article
- Aromatic interactions at the ligand-protein interface: Implications for the development of docking scoring functions.Chemical biology & drug design · 2018Article
- Integrative structure modeling with the Integrative Modeling Platform.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018Article
- Yada: a novel tool for molecular docking calculations.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2016Article
- Error-prone pcr-based mutagenesis strategy for rapidly generating high-yield influenza vaccine candidates.Virology · 2015Article
- Molecular docking and structure-based drug design strategies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Prediction of substrates for glutathione transferases by covalent docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2014Article
- Does a more precise chemical description of protein-ligand complexes lead to more accurate prediction of binding affinity?Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2014Article
- ModBase, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Evaluation of 11 scoring functions performance on matrix metalloproteinases.International journal of medicinal chemistry · 2014Article
- Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Applications in structural biology and medicinal chemistry require protein-ligand scoring functions for two distinct tasks: (i) ranking different poses of a small molecule in a protein binding site and (ii) ranking different small molecules by their complementarity to a protein site. Using probability theory, we developed two atomic distance-dependent statistical scoring functions: PoseScore was optimized for recognizing native binding geometries of ligands from other poses and RankScore was optimized for distinguishing ligands from nonbinding molecules. Both scores are based on a set of 8,885 crystallographic structures of protein-ligand complexes but differ in the values of three key parameters. Factors influencing the accuracy of scoring were investigated, including the maximal atomic distance and non-native ligand geometries used for scoring, as well as the use of protein models instead of crystallographic structures for training and testing the scoring function. For the test set of 19 targets, RankScore improved the ligand enrichment (logAUC) and early enrichment (EF(1)) scores computed by DOCK 3.6 for 13 and 14 targets, respectively. In addition, RankScore performed better at rescoring than each of seven other scoring functions tested. Accepting both the crystal structure and decoy geometries with all-atom root-mean-square errors of up to 2 Å from the crystal structure as correct binding poses, PoseScore gave the best score to a correct binding pose among 100 decoys for 88% of all cases in a benchmark set containing 100 protein-ligand complexes. PoseScore accuracy is comparable to that of DrugScore(CSD) and ITScore/SE and superior to 12 other tested scoring functions. Therefore, RankScore can facilitate ligand discovery, by ranking complexes of the target with different small molecules; PoseScore can be used for protein-ligand complex structure prediction, by ranking different conformations of a given protein-ligand pair. The statistical potentials are available through the Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP) software package (http://salilab.org/imp) and the LigScore Web server (http://salilab.org/ligscore/).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.