Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22014038›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2011

Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.

Hao Fan, Dina Schneidman-Duhovny, John J Irwin, Guangqiang Dong, Brian K Shoichet, Andrej Sali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ligand Strain Energy in Large Library Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrative structure modeling with the Integrative Modeling Platform.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
  13. Yada: a novel tool for molecular docking calculations.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Prediction of substrates for glutathione transferases by covalent docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of 11 scoring functions performance on matrix metalloproteinases.International journal of medicinal chemistry · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao FanDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Dina Schneidman-Duhovny
John J Irwin
Guangqiang Dong
Brian K Shoichet
Andrej Sali

Funding

Core H: MicrobiologyU54GM093342 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GERLT, JOHN A · 2010 to 2015
$34.6M
Theoretical and Computational ApproachesP01GM071790 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI RAUSHEL, FRANK M. · 2004 to 2013
$15.5M
A Web-Based Automatic Virtual Screening SystemR01GM071896 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · PI IRWIN, JOHN J. · 2004 to 2024
$6.0M
DESIGN AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF NEW DOCKING METHODSR01GM059957 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHOICHET, BRIAN K · 1999 to 2017
$4.4M
Protein Modeling by Satisfaction of Spatial RestraintsR01GM054762 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SALI, ANDREJ · 2001 to 2008
$2.1M
PROTEIN MODELING BY SATISFACTION OF SPATIAL RESTRAINTSR29GM054762 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI SALI, ANDREJ · 1996 to 2000
$111k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM093342NIGMS NIH HHS GM54762NIGMS NIH HHS GM59957NIGMS NIH HHS GM71790NIGMS NIH HHS GM71896NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM071790NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054762NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059957NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071896NIGMS NIH HHS R29 GM054762NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM093342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Applications in structural biology and medicinal chemistry require protein-ligand scoring functions for two distinct tasks: (i) ranking different poses of a small molecule in a protein binding site and (ii) ranking different small molecules by their complementarity to a protein site. Using probability theory, we developed two atomic distance-dependent statistical scoring functions: PoseScore was optimized for recognizing native binding geometries of ligands from other poses and RankScore was optimized for distinguishing ligands from nonbinding molecules. Both scores are based on a set of 8,885 crystallographic structures of protein-ligand complexes but differ in the values of three key parameters. Factors influencing the accuracy of scoring were investigated, including the maximal atomic distance and non-native ligand geometries used for scoring, as well as the use of protein models instead of crystallographic structures for training and testing the scoring function. For the test set of 19 targets, RankScore improved the ligand enrichment (logAUC) and early enrichment (EF(1)) scores computed by DOCK 3.6 for 13 and 14 targets, respectively. In addition, RankScore performed better at rescoring than each of seven other scoring functions tested. Accepting both the crystal structure and decoy geometries with all-atom root-mean-square errors of up to 2 Å from the crystal structure as correct binding poses, PoseScore gave the best score to a correct binding pose among 100 decoys for 88% of all cases in a benchmark set containing 100 protein-ligand complexes. PoseScore accuracy is comparable to that of DrugScore(CSD) and ITScore/SE and superior to 12 other tested scoring functions. Therefore, RankScore can facilitate ligand discovery, by ranking complexes of the target with different small molecules; PoseScore can be used for protein-ligand complex structure prediction, by ranking different conformations of a given protein-ligand pair. The statistical potentials are available through the Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP) software package (http://salilab.org/imp) and the LigScore Web server (http://salilab.org/ligscore/).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBinding SitesHumansLigandsModels, MolecularModels, StatisticalMolecular ConformationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22014038
PMCPMC3246566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.