Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22013510›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hypertension2012

Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure in Hypertension: A UK Primary Care Survey.

S Baral-Grant, M S Haque, A Nouwen, S M Greenfield, R J McManus

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hypertension, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02333240 (Self-management of Postnatal Anti-hypertensive Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02333240 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Self-management of Postnatal Anti-hypertensive Treatment: a Trial Development Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2015 to 2016Enrolled101ConditionsPre-Eclampsia, Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedArmsSelf-management of postnatal anti-hypertensive treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S Baral-GrantPrimary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
M S Haque
A Nouwen
S M Greenfield
R J McManus

Funding

Department of Health CDF/01/017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Self-Monitoring Blood Pressure amongst people with hypertension using a cross-sectional survey. Of the 955 who replied (53%), 293 (31%) reported that they self-monitored blood pressure. Nearly 60% (198/331) self-monitored at least monthly. Diabetic patients monitoring their blood glucose were five times more likely than those not monitoring to monitor their blood pressure. Self-monitoring is less common in the UK than internationally, but is practiced by enough people to warrant greater integration into clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID22013510
PMCPMC3195273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.