Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22013393›Full record

ArticleJournal of carcinogenesis2011

Optimizing therapeutic efficacy of chemopreventive agents: A critical review of delivery strategies in oral cancer chemoprevention clinical trials.

Andrew S Holpuch, Kashappa-Goud H Desai, Steven P Schwendeman, Susan R Mallery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of carcinogenesis, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biomarkers and chemopreventives in oral carcinogenesis and its prevention.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew S HolpuchDivision of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Pathology and Anesthesiology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Kashappa-Goud H Desai
Steven P Schwendeman
Susan R Mallery

Funding

University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Program (TL1)UL1RR025755 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$26.3M
Comprehensive Training in Oral &Craniofacial SciencesT32DE014320 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERIDAN, JOHN F · 2001 to 2022
$10.2M
Protein Stability in Polymer Delivery SystemsR01HL068345 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SCHWENDEMAN, STEVEN P. · 2001 to 2011
$2.8M
Chemoprevention of Head & Neck Cancer Using Controlled Release PolymersR01CA129609 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MALLERY, SUSAN R · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Clinical evaluation of a bioadhesive gel for oral cancer chemoprevention.RC2CA148099 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MALLERY, SUSAN R · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
Evaluation of bioadhesive berry gels for oral cancer chemopreventionR21CA132138 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MALLERY, SUSAN R · 2008 to 2009
$390k
Chemopreventive Effects of Black Raspberries and Fenretinide in Oral MucosaF30DE020992 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOLPUCH, ANDREW STEPHEN · 2010 to 2014
$164k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129609NCI NIH HHS R21 CA132138NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148099NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025755NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL068345NIDCR NIH HHS F30 DE020992NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE014320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its characterized progression from recognized premalignant oral epithelial changes (i.e., oral epithelial dysplasia) to invasive cancer, oral squamous cell carcinoma represents an optimal disease for chemopreventive intervention prior to malignant transformation. The primary goal of oral cancer chemoprevention is to reverse, suppress, or inhibit the progression of premalignant lesions to cancer. Over the last several decades, numerous oral cancer chemoprevention clinical trials have assessed the therapeutic efficacy of diverse chemopreventive agents. The standard of care for more advanced oral dysplastic lesions entails surgical excision and close clinical follow-up due to the potential (~33%) for local recurrence at a similar or more advanced histological stage. The purpose of this review was to identify prominent oral cancer chemoprevention clinical trials, assess their overall therapeutic efficacy, and delineate effects of local versus systemic drug administration. In addition, these compiled clinical trial data present concepts for consideration in the design and conduction of future clinical trials.

Indexed as

Chemopreventionlocal drug deliveryoral cancerpharmacologic advantage

Identifiers

PMID22013393
PMCPMC3190566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.