Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22012446›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2012

Albumin handling by renal tubular epithelial cells in a microfluidic bioreactor.

Nicholas Ferrell, Kevin B Ricci, Joseph Groszek, Joseph T Marmerstein, William H Fissell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Development of a hollow fibre-based renal module for active transport studies.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas FerrellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave. ND 20, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Kevin B Ricci
Joseph Groszek
Joseph T Marmerstein
William H Fissell
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

CWRU NEPHROLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007470 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SEDOR, JOHN R. · 1986 to 2019
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007470NIDDK NIH HHS T32-DK-007470-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial cells in the proximal tubule of the kidney reclaim and metabolize protein from the glomerular filtrate. Proteinuria, an overabundance of protein in the urine, affects tubular cell function and is a major factor in the progression of chronic kidney disease. By developing experimental systems to study tubular protein handling in a setting that simulates some of the environmental conditions of the kidney tubule in vivo, we can better understand how microenviromental conditions affect cellular protein handling to determine if these conditions are relevant in disease. To this end, we used two in vitro microfluidic models to evaluate albumin handling by renal proximal tubule cells. For the first system, cells were grown in a microfluidic channel and perfused with physiological levels of shear stress to evaluate the effect of mechanical stress on protein uptake. In the second system, a porous membrane was used to separate an apical and basolateral compartment to evaluate the fate of protein following cellular metabolism. Opossum kidney (OK) epithelial cells were exposed to fluorescently labeled albumin, and cellular uptake was determined by measuring the fluorescence of cell lysates. Confocal fluorescence microscopy was used to compare uptake in cells grown under flow and static conditions. Albumin processed by the cells was examined by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and SDS-PAGE. Results showed that cellular uptake and/or degradation was significantly increased in cells exposed to flow compared to static conditions. This was confirmed by confocal microscopy. Size exclusion chromatography and SDS-PAGE showed that albumin was broken down into small molecular weight fragments and excreted by the cells. No trace of intact albumin was detectable by either SEC or SDS-PAGE. These results indicate that fluid shear stress is an important factor mediating cellular protein handling, and the microfluidic bioreactor provides a novel tool to investigate this process.

Indexed as

BioreactorsAlbuminsAnimalsCells, CulturedChromatography, GelElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelEndocytosisEpithelial CellsKidney TubulesMicrofluidicsMolecular WeightOpossumsProtein TransportProteolysisAlbumins

Identifiers

PMID22012446
PMCPMC3285552
OpenAlexW2044696889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.