Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22012194›Full record

ArticleLab animal2011

Prevalence of viral, bacterial and parasitological diseases in rats and mice used in research environments in Australasia over a 5-y period.

Elizabeth F McInnes, Lorna Rasmussen, Peony Fung, Amanda M Auld, Luisana Alvarez, David A Lawrence, Morgan E Quinn, Tammy D Utteridge, Gloria M del Fierro, Bianca A Vassallo and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab animal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AALAS/FELASA Working Group on Health Monitoring of rodents for animal transfer.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2014
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathogen Prevalence Estimates and Diagnostic Methodology Trends in Laboratory Mice and Rats from 2003 to 2020.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health Monitoring of Laboratory Rodent Colonies-Talking about (R)evolution.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Norovirus Regulation by Host and Microbe.Trends in molecular medicine · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Incidence rates of spontaneous disease in laboratory mice used at a large biomedical research institution.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2013
    Article
  19. Maternal antibodies or nonproductive infections confound the need for rederivation.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Utteridge, Tammy D [removed]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth F McInnesCerberus Sciences, Thebarton, South Australia, Australia. liz@cerberus.net.au
Lorna Rasmussen
Peony Fung
Amanda M Auld
Luisana Alvarez
David A Lawrence
Morgan E Quinn
Tammy D Utteridge
Gloria M del Fierro
Bianca A Vassallo
Robert Stevenson
Medical Developments International (Australia) · AUCerus (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral, bacterial and parasitological infections in rats and mice used in biomedical research continue to occur despite improved housing and biosurveillance. The presence of disease in laboratory animals can lead to spurious results for research undertaken in universities, research institutes and the pharmaceutical industry. Here the authors report the results of serological, microbiological, parasitological and molecular tests done on mice and rats from Australasia submitted to a rodent health monitoring laboratory (Cerberus Sciences) from 2004 to 2009. In tested mice, norovirus was the most prevalent virus and ectromelia virus was the least prevalent virus. In tested rats, pneumonia virus of mice was the most prevalent virus and adenoviruses 1 and 2 were the least prevalent viruses. In mice, Helicobacter hepaticus was the most prevalent bacterium, and in rats, Proteus spp. were the most prevalent bacteria. The most common positive helminthological finding in mice and rats was the presence of all pinworms (including Aspicularis spp. and Syphacia spp.). The most common positive protozoan findings in mice and rats were Chilomastix spp. and Trichomonads.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ViralAustralasiaEnterobiusFecesHelicobacter hepaticusInfectionsMiceMurine pneumonia virusNorovirusPrevalenceRatsRetortamonadidaeRodent DiseasesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID22012194
PMCPMC7091690
OpenAlexW2093704979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.