Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22012008›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical microbiology2011

PCR diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia: a bivariate meta-analysis.

Yuan Lu, Guoya Ling, Chenyi Qiang, Qinshou Ming, Cong Wu, Ke Wang, Zouxiao Ying

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Polymerase Chain Reaction on Respiratory Tract Specimens of Immunocompromised Patients to Diagnose Pneumocystis Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Evaluation of the ELITe InGenius PCR assay compared with immunofluorescence for Pneumocystis jirovecii detection in respiratory samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. An overview of the laboratory diagnosis ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Diagnosis ofInfection & chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An Evaluation of the OLMJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuan LuDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Guoya Ling
Chenyi Qiang
Qinshou Ming
Cong Wu
Ke Wang
Zouxiao Ying

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We undertook a bivariate meta-analysis to assess the overall accuracy of respiratory specimen PCR assays for diagnosing Pneumocystis pneumonia. The summary sensitivity and specificity were 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.00) and 0.90 (0.87 to 0.93). Subgroup analyses showed that quantitative PCR analysis and the major surface glycoprotein gene target had the highest specificity value (0.93). Respiratory specimen PCR results are sufficient to confirm or exclude the disease for at-risk patients suspected of having Pneumocystis pneumonia.

Indexed as

HumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycologyPneumocystisPneumonia, PneumocystisPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22012008
PMCPMC3232995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.