Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22011937›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2012

Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay.

Mary-Anne Aarts, Allan Okrainec, Amy Glicksman, Emily Pearsall, J Charles Victor, Robin S McLeod

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04201730 (A Single Center, Open, Randomized Clinical Trial:Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)in Gastrointestinal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04201730 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Single Center, Open, Randomized Clinical Trial:Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)in Gastrointestinal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHuashan HospitalRan2019 to 2021Enrolled356ConditionsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery, Gastrointestinal CancerArmsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The effect of enhanced recovery program for patients undergoing partial laparoscopic hepatectomy of liver cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2015
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mary-Anne AartsDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. maart@tegh.on.ca
Allan Okrainec
Amy Glicksman
Emily Pearsall
J Charles Victor
Robin S McLeod
University of Toronto · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAToronto East General Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs is to incorporate strategies into the perioperative care plan to decrease complications, hasten recovery, and shorten hospital stay. This study was designed to determine which ERAS strategies contribute to overall shortened length of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in hospitals.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of 336 consecutive patients at seven hospitals was performed. Demographic and data on 18 ERAS components identified from a systematic review of the literature were collected. A multiregression analysis was performed to assess for factors independently associated with a total length of hospital stay of 5 days or less.

resultsFifty-five percent were male (mean age, 62 years), 57.5% had an ASA III or IV, 76.9% had cancer, and 28.6% had low rectal procedures; 46.3% were completed laparoscopically. The median length of stay was 6.5 days with a mean of 8.6 days. On bivariate analysis, strategies associated with a stay ≤ 5 days were preoperative counseling, avoidance of oral bowel preparation, use of a laparoscopic approach, use of a transverse incision, introduction of clear fluids on day of surgery, and early discontinuation of the Foley catheter (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, factors that remained significantly associated with a stay ≤ 5 days included use of a laparoscopic approach (odds ratio (OR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-1.38), preoperative counseling (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.38), intraoperative fluid restriction (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.37), clear fluids on day of surgery (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.00-1.2), and Foley urinal catheter discontinued within 24 h of colon surgery and 72 h of rectal surgery (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27).

conclusionsIn hospitals with variable uptake of ERAS strategies, preoperative counseling, intraoperative fluid restriction, use of a laparoscopic approach, immediate initiation of clear fluids after surgery, and early discontinuation of the Foley catheter are all independently associated with shortened length of stay.

Indexed as

AgedColonic DiseasesColorectal SurgeryEarly AmbulationFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMalePerioperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionRectal DiseasesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22011937
OpenAlexW1985631247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.