Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22011932›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2012

Patient-reported outcomes and different approaches to urinary parameters in overactive bladder: what should we measure?

Vik Khullar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Development of a core set of outcome measures for OAB treatment.International urogynecology journal · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vik KhullarUrogynaecology Department, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK. vik.khullar@imperial.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overactive bladder (OAB) is highly prevalent and associated with considerable impact on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Assessment of HRQoL can reveal the burden of disease and post-intervention improvement. This review aims to highlight the importance of HRQoL assessment and outline the tools available for use in clinical trials and real-world clinical practice. A number of validated measures of HRQoL specific to OAB have been developed, offering greater sensitivity and responsiveness over generic instruments. These condition-specific, multi-dimensional and single-item global questionnaires are particularly useful for the multiple and varied symptoms of OAB, as they reflect the patient's needs, concerns and values. Measurements for lower urinary tract symptoms, e.g. bladder diaries, are being compared with HRQoL instruments to provide greater understanding of the disease and treatment from the patient's perspective. Therapeutic interventions to improve OAB symptoms should also be evaluated for their effect on the patient's HRQoL.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesFemaleHumansNocturiaPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeSelf ReportUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.