Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22011785›Full record

ReviewCell and tissue research2012

In situ guided tissue regeneration in musculoskeletal diseases and aging : Implementing pathology into tailored tissue engineering strategies.

Franz Jakob, Regina Ebert, Maximilian Rudert, Ulrich Nöth, Heike Walles, Denitsa Docheva, Matthias Schieker, Lorenz Meinel, Jürgen Groll

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell and tissue research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Textile cell-free scaffolds for in situ tissue engineering applications.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2016
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Biologics for tendon repair.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2015
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Tendon and ligament regeneration and repair: clinical relevance and developmental paradigm.Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews · 2013
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Franz JakobOrthopedic Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Julius Maximilians University of Wuerzburg, Brettreichstrasse 11, Wuerzburg, Germany. f-jakob.klh@mail.uni-wuerzburg.de
Regina Ebert
Maximilian Rudert
Ulrich Nöth
Heike Walles
Denitsa Docheva
Matthias Schieker
Lorenz Meinel
Jürgen Groll
University of Würzburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In situ guided tissue regeneration, also addressed as in situ tissue engineering or endogenous regeneration, has a great potential for population-wide "minimal invasive" applications. During the last two decades, tissue engineering has been developed with remarkable in vitro and preclinical success but still the number of applications in clinical routine is extremely small. Moreover, the vision of population-wide applications of ex vivo tissue engineered constructs based on cells, growth and differentiation factors and scaffolds, must probably be deemed unrealistic for economic and regulation-related issues. Hence, the progress made in this respect will be mostly applicable to a fraction of post-traumatic or post-surgery situations such as big tissue defects due to tumor manifestation. Minimally invasive procedures would probably qualify for a broader application and ideally would only require off the shelf standardized products without cells. Such products should mimic the microenvironment of regenerating tissues and make use of the endogenous tissue regeneration capacities. Functionally, the chemotaxis of regenerative cells, their amplification as a transient amplifying pool and their concerted differentiation and remodeling should be addressed. This is especially important because the main target populations for such applications are the elderly and diseased. The quality of regenerative cells is impaired in such organisms and high levels of inhibitors also interfere with regeneration and healing. In metabolic bone diseases like osteoporosis, it is already known that antagonists for inhibitors such as activin and sclerostin enhance bone formation. Implementing such strategies into applications for in situ guided tissue regeneration should greatly enhance the efficacy of tailored procedures in the future.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansMusculoskeletal DiseasesRegenerationTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID22011785
PMCPMC3306563
OpenAlexW2025072736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.