Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22011625›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2011

Removing bias against membrane proteins in interaction networks.

Glauber C Brito, David W Andrews

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Proteomic Analysis of COVID-19 Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Geometric characterisation of disease modules.Applied network science · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Glauber C BritoDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada. brito@mcmaster.ca
David W Andrews
McMaster University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCellular interaction networks can be used to analyze the effects on cell signaling and other functional consequences of perturbations to cellular physiology. Thus, several methods have been used to reconstitute interaction networks from multiple published datasets. However, the structure and performance of these networks depends on both the quality and the unbiased nature of the original data. Due to the inherent bias against membrane proteins in protein-protein interaction (PPI) data, interaction networks can be compromised particularly if they are to be used in conjunction with drug screening efforts, since most drug-targets are membrane proteins.

resultsTo overcome the experimental bias against PPIs involving membrane-associated proteins we used a probabilistic approach based on a hypergeometric distribution followed by logistic regression to simultaneously optimize the weights of different sources of interaction data. The resulting less biased genome-scale network constructed for the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed that the starvation pathway is a distinct subnetwork of autophagy and retrieved a more integrated network of unfolded protein response genes. We also observed that the centrality-lethality rule depends on the content of membrane proteins in networks.

conclusionsWe show here that the bias against membrane proteins can and should be corrected in order to have a better representation of the interactions and topological properties of protein interaction networks.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalProtein Interaction MapsAutophagyCell CommunicationMembrane ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionSystems BiologyMembrane ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22011625
PMCPMC3213014
OpenAlexW2145833938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.