Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22011466›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography2011

Some B(eq) are more equivalent than others.

Ethan A Merritt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. B-factor accuracy in protein crystal structures.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Local and global analysis of macromolecular atomic displacement parameters.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysis and validation of macromolecular B values.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ethan A MerrittDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7742, USA. merritt@u.washington.edu

Funding

Software tools for analysis and visulaization of protein structureR01GM080232 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MERRITT, ETHAN A · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080232NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM080232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crystallographic structural models for macromolecules have typically included an isotropic displacement parameter B(iso) for each atom. In cases where the structural model instead includes anisotropic displacement parameters U(ij), the derived quantity B(eq) can be substituted for B(iso) for many purposes. B(eq) is not, however, the best predictor of the value B(iso) that would hypothetically have been obtained by direct refinement of an isotropic model. A new entity B(est) is proposed that represents an estimate for B(iso) that minimizes the Kullback-Leibler divergence from a paired anisotropic model. In general B(est)/B(eq) < 1, with the difference between the two values becoming larger for atoms that are more anisotropic. Although this difference does not affect direct refinement of either isotropic or anisotropic models, it is relevant to any analysis that compares isotropic and anisotropic models of the same underlying structure. In particular, it may lead to improved selection of multi-group TLS models based on analysis of an initial isotropic refinement.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAnisotropyCrystallography, X-RayHumansProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22011466
PMCPMC3211245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.