Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22011284›Full record

ArticleCancer investigation2011

A phase I multicenter study of continuous oral administration of lonafarnib (SCH 66336) and intravenous gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer.

Nan Soon Wong, Kellen L Meadows, Lee S Rosen, Alex A Adjei, Scott H Kaufmann, Michael A Morse, William P Petros, Yali Zhu, Paul Statkevich, David L Cutler and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. HBV and HDV: New Treatments on the Horizon.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Emerging RAS-directed therapies for cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nan Soon WongDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kellen L Meadows
Lee S Rosen
Alex A Adjei
Scott H Kaufmann
Michael A Morse
William P Petros
Yali Zhu
Paul Statkevich
David L Cutler
Michael L Meyers
Herbert I Hurwitz

Funding

Wound Angiogenesis as a Biomarker for Tumor AngiogenesisK24CA113755 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HURWITZ, HERBERT I · 2006 to 2010
$613k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA113755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a phase I study to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and activity of lonafarnib plus gemcitabine. Subjects received oral lonafarnib twice daily and gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days; multiple dose levels were explored. Lonafarnib had no apparent effect on gemcitabine PK. Mean lonafarnib half-life ranged from 4 to 7 hr; median T(max) values ranged from 4 to 8 hr. Two patients had partial response; seven patients had stable disease at least 6 months. Oral lonafarnib at 150 mg a.m./100 mg p.m. plus gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m(2) is the maximum tolerated dose with acceptable safety and tolerability.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineDibenzocycloheptenesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGemcitabineHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPiperidinesPyridinesDeoxycytidineDibenzocycloheptenesGemcitabinelonafarnibPiperidinesPyridines

Identifiers

PMID22011284
PMCPMC4101887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.