ArticleBMC developmental biology2011
Conserved and non-conserved enhancers direct tissue specific transcription in ancient germ layer specific developmental control genes.
Article in BMC developmental biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Copy number variations residing outside the SHOX enhancer region are involved in Short Stature and Léri-Weill dyschondrosteosis.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022Article
- Heart Enhancers: Development and Disease Control at a Distance.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Article
- Enhancer RNAs are an important regulatory layer of the epigenome.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2020Review
- A novel conserved enhancer at zebrafish zic3 and zic6 loci drives neural expression.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2019Article
- Developmental History Provides a Roadmap for the Emergence of Tumor Plasticity.Developmental cell · 2018Article
- Complexity and conservation of regulatory landscapes underlie evolutionary resilience of mammalian gene expression.Nature ecology & evolution · 2018Article
- An Integrative Developmental Genomics and Systems Biology Approach to Identify an In Vivo Sox Trio-Mediated Gene Regulatory Network in Murine Embryos.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- Article
- Mammalian TBX1 preferentially binds and regulates downstream targets via a tandem T-site repeat.PloS one · 2014Article
- Enhancer turnover and conserved regulatory function in vertebrate evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013Article
- The mystery of extreme non-coding conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013Review
- Histone H3.3. mutations drive pediatric glioblastoma through upregulation of MYCN.Cancer discovery · 2013Article
- Identification of a Novel 14q13.3 Deletion Involving the SLC25A21 Gene Associated with Familial Synpolydactyly.Molecular syndromology · 2012Article
- Regulatory genomics: Insights from the zebrafish.Current topics in genetics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying DNA sequences (enhancers) that direct the precise spatial and temporal expression of developmental control genes remains a significant challenge in the annotation of vertebrate genomes. Locating these sequences, which in many cases lie at a great distance from the transcription start site, has been a major obstacle in deciphering gene regulation. Coupling of comparative genomics with functional validation to locate such regulatory elements has been a successful method in locating many such regulatory elements. But most of these studies looked either at a single gene only or the whole genome without focusing on any particular process. The pressing need is to integrate the tools of comparative genomics with knowledge of developmental biology to validate enhancers for developmental transcription factors in greater detail
resultsOur results show that near four different genes (nkx3.2, pax9, otx1b and foxa2) in zebrafish, only 20-30% of highly conserved DNA sequences can act as developmental enhancers irrespective of the tissue the gene expresses in. We find that some genes also have multiple conserved enhancers expressing in the same tissue at the same or different time points in development. We also located non-conserved enhancers for two of the genes (pax9 and otx1b). Our modified Bacterial artificial chromosome (BACs) studies for these 4 genes revealed that many of these enhancers work in a synergistic fashion, which cannot be captured by individual DNA constructs and are not conserved at the sequence level. Our detailed biochemical and transgenic analysis revealed Foxa1 binds to the otx1b non-conserved enhancer to direct its activity in forebrain and otic vesicle of zebrafish at 24 hpf.
conclusionOur results clearly indicate that high level of functional conservation of genes is not necessarily associated with sequence conservation of its regulatory elements. Moreover certain non conserved DNA elements might have role in gene regulation. The need is to bring together multiple approaches to bear upon individual genes to decipher all its regulatory elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.