Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22010213›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2012

Molecular determinants of retinoic acid sensitivity in pancreatic cancer.

Sonal Gupta, Dipankar Pramanik, Radha Mukherjee, Nathaniel R Campbell, Sathyanarayanan Elumalai, Roeland F de Wilde, Seung-Mo Hong, Michael G Goggins, Ana De Jesus-Acosta, Daniel Laheru and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Retinoic acid in health and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A Carabrane-Type Sesquiterpenolide Carabrone fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sonal GuptaDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Dipankar Pramanik
Radha Mukherjee
Nathaniel R Campbell
Sathyanarayanan Elumalai
Roeland F de Wilde
Seung-Mo Hong
Michael G Goggins
Ana De Jesus-Acosta
Daniel Laheru
Anirban Maitra
Johns Hopkins University · USCancer Research Center · US

Funding

Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JAFFEE, ELIZABETH M. · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
Zebrafish CoreP01CA134292 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUSO, DAVID L · 2009 to 2013
$7.4M
Hedgehog Inhibitors in Pancreas CancerR01CA113669 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MAITRA, ANIRBAN · 2005 to 2014
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA134292NCI NIH HHS P01CA134292NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924NCI NIH HHS P50CA062924NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113669NCI NIH HHS R01CA113669NCI NIH HHS R01CA14767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify a predictive molecular "signature" for sensitivity to retinoic acid in pancreatic cancer. EXPERIMENTAL

designFourteen patient-derived, low-passage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) lines with varied expression of fatty acid-binding protein 5 (FABP5) and cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2 (CRABP2) were used to evaluate the response to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). Cell proliferation, apoptosis, and migration/invasion assays were used to measure the in vitro response. Tumor growth was monitored in subcutaneous xenografts in athymic nude mice for 4 weeks.

resultsResponse to ATRA was observed to be dependent upon differential expression of FABP5 versus CRABP2. Thus, elevated FABP5 expression was associated with minimal cytotoxicity and tumor growth inhibition and a paradoxical increase in migration and invasion. Conversely, CRABP2 expression in the absence of FABP5 was associated with significant tumor growth inhibition with ATRA, even in gemcitabine-resistant tumors. The ATRA-resistant phenotype of FABP5(high)CRABP2(null) cells could be circumvented by ectopic expression of CRABP2. Alternatively, reexpression of endogenous CRABP2 could be enabled in FABP5(high)CRABP2(null) PDAC lines by exposure to decitabine and trichostatin A, thereby relieving epigenetic silencing of the CRABP2 gene promoter. Immunohistochemical staining for FABP5 in archival human tissue microarrays identifies a subset of cases (13 of 63, ~20%) which are negative for FABP5 expression and might be candidates for ATRA therapy.

conclusionsThe widely used agent ATRA deserves a "second look" in PDAC, but needs to be targeted to patient subsets with biopsy-proven FABP5-negative tumors, or be combined with a chromatin-modifying agent to reexpress endogenous CRABP2.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorBlotting, WesternCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell AdhesionCell MovementCell ProliferationDNA MethylationFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMiceAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorFABP5 protein, humanFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsReceptors, Retinoic Acidretinoic acid binding protein II, cellularRNA, MessengerTretinoin

Identifiers

PMID22010213
PMCPMC3251696
OpenAlexW2149566991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.