Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22010043›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2011

Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Aaron Boster, Mary Pat Bartoszek, Colleen O'Connell, David Pitt, Michael Racke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Drug-induced liver injury by glatiramer acetate leading to liver transplant: A case report.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Article
  4. Neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Use of Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Risk evaluation and monitoring in multiple sclerosis therapeutics.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Glatiramer acetate protects against inflammatory synaptopathy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron BosterMultiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology The Ohio State University Medical Center 395 West 12th Avenue, 7th floor Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Mary Pat Bartoszek
Colleen O'Connell
David Pitt
Michael Racke
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current Multiple Sclerosis (MS) therapeutic landscape is rapidly growing. Glatiramer acetate (GA) remains unique given its non-immunosuppressive mechanism of action as well as its superior long-term safety and sustained efficacy data. In this review, we discuss proposed mechanisms of action of GA. Then we review efficacy data for reduction of relapses and slowing disability as well as long term safety data. Finally we discuss possible future directions of this unique polymer in the treatment of MS.

Indexed as

copaxone®disease modifying therapiesglatiramer acetatemultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID22010043
PMCPMC3187678
OpenAlexW2045331716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.