Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22009800›Full record

Trial reportHead & neck2012

Phase II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue in young adults.

Merrill S Kies, Dowin H Boatright, Guojun Li, George Blumenschein, Adel K El-Naggar, G Brandon Gunn, Jan S Lewin, Ganene D Steinhaus, Erich M Sturgis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Head & neck, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02985255 (Role of Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy in Organ Preservation in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Oral Tongue), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02985255 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Role of Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy in Organ Preservation in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Oral Tongue

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealthCare Global Enterprise Ltd.Ran2016 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsTongue Neoplasms, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Anterior Tongue Squamous Cell CarcinomaArmsDocetaxel, Cisplatin, 5FU, Radiotherapy, Glossectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Merrill S KiesDepartment of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dowin H Boatright
Guojun Li
George Blumenschein
Adel K El-Naggar
G Brandon Gunn
Jan S Lewin
Ganene D Steinhaus
Erich M Sturgis
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a phase II clinical trial of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery ± radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue (SCCOT) in young adults.

methodsFrom September 2001 to October 2004, 23 patients aged 18 to 49 years with clinical T2-3 N0-2 M0 SCCOT and no prior radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or neck dissection underwent induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin) followed by glossectomy and neck dissection ± radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

resultsOn final surgical pathology, 9 patients (39%) had a complete/major (2 complete) histologic response at the primary tumor site; 8 patients (35%) had no response or progression. Similarly, 9 patients (39%) had a complete response in the neck or remained node negative; 6 patients (26%) had an increase in nodal category. No treatment-associated deaths occurred, and toxicity was modest. At a median follow-up from the end of treatment of 52 months (minimum, 23 months), 10 patients (43%) developed recurrence, and all 10 died of cancer. Crude recurrence/cancer death rates were associated with ≤ a partial response at the tongue (p = .029), poor histologic differentiation (p = .012), and multiple adverse features on final surgical pathology (p = .040).

conclusionResponse rates and overall survival with this induction chemotherapy regimen were limited, but complete/major response at the tongue was associated with excellent prognosis. Additionally, improved patient selection and predictive tumor biomarkers will be needed for induction chemotherapy to be routinely incorporated into the treatment of oral tongue cancer in young adults.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlossectomyHumansIfosfamideInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeck DissectionNeoplasms, Squamous CellPaclitaxelCarboplatinIfosfamidePaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID22009800
PMCPMC3893095
OpenAlexW2127894374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.