ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2011
Diagnostic pathways of the complex patients: rapid intensive observation in an Acute Medical Unit.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimizing efficiency in the acute care chain: a systematic review on the implementation and impact of interdisciplinary short-term monitoring in acute care units.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Admission criteria for a cardiovascular short stay unit: a retrospective analysis on a pilot unit.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Article
- The acute medical unit model: A characterisation based upon the National Health Service in Scotland.PloS one · 2018Article
- A novel organizational model to face the challenge of multimorbid elderly patients in an internal medicine setting: a case study from Parma Hospital, Italy.Internal and emergency medicine · 2016Article
- The evidence for acute internal medicine and acute medical units.Future hospital journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present-day patients have complex diseases that are responsible for the great increase of medical interventions, overcrowding in emergency departments and access to the wards, increased waiting times and length of stay, difficult discharge, increased readmission rate and finally increased mortality. By breaking the steps of the patients pathways it allows us to simplify the problems and to face the individual aspects of the complexity related to the management of patients in the hospital. One solution that has been growing in popularity is the rapid intensive observation of the patients in acute hospital setting within Internal Medicine wards. This model has been otherwise defined with different terminology, but the most widely used name is Acute Medical Unit (AMU). We describe the model of an AMU within an Internal Medicine department as proposed and adopted in Anglo-Saxon countries, the methods of clinical approach and the practical organisation of the units in close collaboration with the ED ward. Finally we report our experience at an Internal Medicine department in Padova and the initial results obtained during the first 4 months of the project. Our approach of intensive rapid observation of intermediate risk patients admitted from the ED led to a significant reduction in the duration of hospitalization, without increasing readmission rate after discharge and fatality rate. Factors significantly associated to a short hospital stay were a preserved function and a lower number of previous admissions to the hospital. Several gray zones in the realisation and management of the project were identified and the possible solutions are still matter of discussion and debate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22009617What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.