Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22008035›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2011

Kinetic analysis of the unique error signature of human DNA polymerase ν.

Mercedes E Arana, Olga Potapova, Thomas A Kunkel, Catherine M Joyce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structure and function relationships in mammalian DNA polymerases.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  2. DNA Polymerase ν Rapidly Bypasses OChemical research in toxicology · 2016
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in eukaryotes.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mercedes E AranaLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Olga Potapova
Thomas A Kunkel
Catherine M Joyce
Yale University · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Structure-Function Studies Of DNA Replication FidelityZIAES065070 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUNKEL, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2025
$30.6M
STRUCTURE/FUNCTION OF DNA POLYMERASE I OF E COLIR01GM028550 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GRINDLEY, NIGEL DAVID · 1985 to 2010
$5.8M
Structure-Function Studies Of DNA Replication FidelityZ01ES065070 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUNKEL, THOMAS A · 1991 to 2008
$4.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES065070Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES065070NIGMS NIH HHS GM28550NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fidelity of DNA synthesis by A-family DNA polymerases ranges from very accurate for bacterial, bacteriophage, and mitochondrial family members to very low for certain eukaryotic homologues. The latter include DNA polymerase ν (Pol ν) which, among all A-family polymerases, is uniquely prone to misincorporating dTTP opposite template G in a highly sequence-dependent manner. Here we present a kinetic analysis of this unusual error specificity, in four different sequence contexts and in comparison to Pol ν's more accurate A-family homologue, the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. The kinetic data strongly correlate with rates of stable misincorporation during gap-filling DNA synthesis. The lower fidelity of Pol ν compared to that of Klenow fragment can be attributed primarily to a much lower catalytic efficiency for correct dNTP incorporation, whereas both enzymes have similar kinetic parameters for G-dTTP misinsertion. The major contributor to sequence-dependent differences in Pol ν error rates is the reaction rate, k(pol). In the sequence context where fidelity is highest, k(pol) for correct G-dCTP incorporation by Pol ν is ~15-fold faster than k(pol) for G-dTTP misinsertion. However, in sequence contexts where the error rate is higher, k(pol) is the same for both correct and mismatched dNTPs, implying that the transition state does not provide additional discrimination against misinsertion. The results suggest that Pol ν may be fine-tuned to function when high enzyme activity is not a priority and may even be disadvantageous and that the relaxed active-site specificity toward the G-dTTP mispair may be associated with its cellular function(s).

Indexed as

Base Pair MismatchDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IEscherichia coliHumansKineticsDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IPOLN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22008035
PMCPMC3235957
OpenAlexW2005591468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.