Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22006910›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2011

In vivo optical imaging and dynamic contrast methods for biomedical research.

Elizabeth M C Hillman, Cyrus B Amoozegar, Tracy Wang, Addason F H McCaslin, Matthew B Bouchard, James Mansfield, Richard M Levenson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cutting-edge technologies in neural regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Mesoscale calcium imagingFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  6. ClickablePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Nanotechnology-Assisted Cell Tracking.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth M C HillmanLaboratory for Functional Optical Imaging, Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA. eh2245@columbia.edu
Cyrus B Amoozegar
Tracy Wang
Addason F H McCaslin
Matthew B Bouchard
James Mansfield
Richard M Levenson

Funding

The Role of Inflammation and Stroma in Digestive CancerU54CA126513 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, TIMOTHY CRAGIN · 2006 to 2010
$5.1M
In-vivo optical imaging of neurovascular coupling and cerebral metabolismR01NS063226 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HILLMAN, ELIZABETH M. C. · 2008 to 2019
$3.5M
A Depth-resolved Voltage Sensitive Dye Imaging SystemR21NS053684 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HILLMAN, ELIZABETH M. C. · 2006 to 2007
$405k
In-vivo optical molecular imaging with Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DyCE)R43EB008627 · NIBIB · CAMBRIDGE RESEARCH AND INSTRUMENTATION · PI LEVENSON, RICHARD M. · 2008 to 2008
$167k
NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA126513NCI NIH HHS U54 CA126513NIBIB NIH HHS 1R43EB008627NIBIB NIH HHS R43 EB008627NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS063226NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS063226NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS053684NINDS NIH HHS R21NS053684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of optical imaging methods commonly applied to basic research applications. Optical imaging is well suited for non-clinical use, since it can exploit an enormous range of endogenous and exogenous forms of contrast that provide information about the structure and function of tissues ranging from single cells to entire organisms. An additional benefit of optical imaging that is often under-exploited is its ability to acquire data at high speeds; a feature that enables it to not only observe static distributions of contrast, but to probe and characterize dynamic events related to physiology, disease progression and acute interventions in real time. The benefits and limitations of in vivo optical imaging for biomedical research applications are described, followed by a perspective on future applications of optical imaging for basic research centred on a recently introduced real-time imaging technique called dynamic contrast-enhanced small animal molecular imaging (DyCE).

Indexed as

Optics and PhotonicsAnimalsBiomedical ResearchContrast MediaDiagnostic ImagingHemoglobinsHumansLightMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceReproducibility of ResultsScattering, RadiationTime FactorsTransgenesWhole Body ImagingContrast MediaHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID22006910
PMCPMC3263788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.