Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2200662›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives1990

Normal histology of the nasal cavity and application of special techniques.

L C Uraih, R R Maronpot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A multimodaliScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Olfactory Evaluation in Clinical Medical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Tumours of Nasal Septum: A Retrospective Study of 32 Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Process development and safety evaluation of ABCB5Stem cell research & therapy · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L C UraihNational Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
R R Maronpot

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are three major epithelial types in the nasal mucosa, in addition to numerous accessory structures, some of which are species specific. Without careful and consistent processing of the nose tissue, histopathologic assessment of lesions in the nasal cavity may be compromised. While formalin fixation may be used for routine review of the nasal cavity, Bouin's fixation provides better histologic detail and fewer artifacts. Decalcification is not recommended for nasal tissues to be examined by transmission electron microscopy because of the detrimental effect of decalcifying solutions on sensory cells. Three levels of the nasal cavity may be used for routine histologic review of the nasal cavity, but four or five levels may be more appropriate for certain studies.

Indexed as

Acetic AcidHistological TechniquesAcetatesAnimalsDecalcification TechniqueEpitheliumFixativesFormaldehydeMaleMicroscopy, ElectronNasal CavityNasal MucosaPicratesRatsRats, Inbred F344AcetatesAcetic AcidBouin's solutionFixativesFormaldehydePicrates

Identifiers

PMID2200662
PMCPMC1568325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.