Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22006424›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2012

Tractography of the corticospinal tracts in infants with focal perinatal injury: comparison with normal controls and to motor development.

Elise Roze, Polly A Harris, Gareth Ball, Leire Zubiaurre Elorza, Rodrigo M Braga, Joanna M Allsop, Nazakat Merchant, Emma Porter, Tomoki Arichi, A David Edwards and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05013736 (Perinatal Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05013736 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Perinatal Stroke: Longitudinal Assessment of Infant Brain Organization and Recovery Through Neuroexcitability, Neuroimaging and Motor Development

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2022 to 2026Enrolled65ConditionsPerinatal StrokeArmsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Behavioral Assessments, Non invasive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding Brain Reorganization in Infants With Perinatal Stroke Through Neuroexcitability and Neuroimaging.Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Elise RozeCentre for the Developing Brain, Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
Polly A Harris
Gareth Ball
Leire Zubiaurre Elorza
Rodrigo M Braga
Joanna M Allsop
Nazakat Merchant
Emma Porter
Tomoki Arichi
A David Edwards
Mary A Rutherford
Frances M Cowan
Serena J Counsell
Hammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial Valley College · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120081323Medical Research Council MC_U120088465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOur aims were to (1) assess the corticospinal tracts (CSTs) in infants with focal injury and healthy term controls using probabilistic tractography and (2) to correlate the conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and tractography findings in infants with focal injury with their later motor function.

methodsWe studied 20 infants with focal lesions and 23 controls using MRI and diffusion tensor imaging. Tract volume, fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity (RD) of the CSTs were determined. Asymmetry indices (AIs) were calculated by comparing ipsilateral to contralateral CSTs. Motor outcome was assessed using a standardized neurological examination.

resultsConventional MRI was able to predict normal motor development (n = 9) or hemiplegia (n = 6). In children who developed a mild motor asymmetry (n = 5), conventional MRI predicted a hemiplegia in two and normal motor development in three infants. The AIs for tract volume, FA, ADC and RD showed a significant difference between controls and infants who developed a hemiplegia, and RD also showed a significant difference in AI between controls and infants who developed a mild asymmetry.

conclusionConventional MRI was able to predict subsequent normal motor development or hemiplegia following focal injury in newborn infants. Measures of RD obtained from diffusion tractography may offer additional information for predicting a subsequent asymmetry in motor function.

Indexed as

AnisotropyBrain InfarctionBrain IschemiaCase-Control StudiesDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHemiplegiaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantMaleMotor SkillsNeurologic ExaminationPredictive Value of TestsPyramidal Tracts

Identifiers

PMID22006424
OpenAlexW1963902987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.