Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22006185›Full record

ArticleDer Internist2011

[Treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism].

S M Schellong

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Internist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S M SchellongMedizinische Klinik 2, Städtisches Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstraße 41, 01067, Dresden. schellong-se@khdf.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism may be considered as different manifestations of the same disease: venous thromboembolism. Under the condition of entirely stable hemodynamics, treatment follows exactly the same principles. The phase of initial therapy has a duration of 5-10 days and has remained so far a domain of parenteral anticoagulants (low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux). The phase of early maintenance therapy is instituted with an overlap and has a duration of 3-6 months; vitamin K antagonists with a target INR of 2.0-3.0 are the standard. Patients with a high risk of recurrence and a low risk of bleeding will enter a phase of prolonged or even indefinite maintenance therapy. Again, vitamin K antagonists with a target INR of 2.0-3.0 are the standard. A target INR of 1.5-2.0 may be considered an alternative for patients in whom a very stable anticoagulation with less frequent INR testing is desirable. Clear recommendations can be made for venous thromboembolism treatment in pregnancy, in the post partum and lactation periods, as well as for patients with severe renal impairment. New anticoagulants (thrombin inhibitors, factor Xa inhibitors) have made significant progress in their clinical development and will soon become available as an alternative for all three phases of therapy.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPulmonary EmbolismVenous ThrombosisAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.