ArticleDer Internist2011
[Treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism].
Article in Der Internist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing resource allocation: Cost-effectiveness of specified D-dimer cut-offs in cancer patients with suspected venous thromboembolism.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism may be considered as different manifestations of the same disease: venous thromboembolism. Under the condition of entirely stable hemodynamics, treatment follows exactly the same principles. The phase of initial therapy has a duration of 5-10 days and has remained so far a domain of parenteral anticoagulants (low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux). The phase of early maintenance therapy is instituted with an overlap and has a duration of 3-6 months; vitamin K antagonists with a target INR of 2.0-3.0 are the standard. Patients with a high risk of recurrence and a low risk of bleeding will enter a phase of prolonged or even indefinite maintenance therapy. Again, vitamin K antagonists with a target INR of 2.0-3.0 are the standard. A target INR of 1.5-2.0 may be considered an alternative for patients in whom a very stable anticoagulation with less frequent INR testing is desirable. Clear recommendations can be made for venous thromboembolism treatment in pregnancy, in the post partum and lactation periods, as well as for patients with severe renal impairment. New anticoagulants (thrombin inhibitors, factor Xa inhibitors) have made significant progress in their clinical development and will soon become available as an alternative for all three phases of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22006185What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.